From: email@example.com (Andromeda.net- Anderson, Jared) Date: Mon, 03 Nov 1997 01:50:04 -0700 Fwd Date: Mon, 03 Nov 1997 08:04:41 -0500 Subject: Re: ET Hypothesis: Government Concern? > From: Henny van der Pluijm <firstname.lastname@example.org> > Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 04:24:14 +0100 (MET) > Fwd Date: Sun, 02 Nov 1997 22:49:06 -0500 > Subject: Re: ET Hypothesis: Government Concern? > >Date: Sun, 2 Nov 1997 15:09:32 -0500 > >From: Peregrine Mendoza <email@example.com> [Peter Brookesmith] > >Subject: ET Hypothesis: Government Concern? > >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <firstname.lastname@example.org> > >The Duke of Mendoza present his compliments... > >I'm not entirely surprised it's red, as (unless you know > >something no one else does) the RBAF F-16s were chasing > >monnbeams, or whatever, on 30/31 March 90, whereas van Utrecht > >No need to repeat the date again, is there? > >And the words 'may have been' are not quite the ones one would > >use in "explaining" something "away", are they? > >Note that only once (00.32hrs) while the F-16s were in the air > >did both the Glons and Semmerzake radars simultaneously have a > >contact with an "unknown" on the same heading (110 deg. 6NM > >from Beauchevin, alt 6000ft). However, the control center at > >Maastricht couldn't see this on radar. Likewise while the F-16s > >were aloft, the highest speed of the OVNIs mentioned in the > >RBAF report I have is 740kt, tho' some rapid accelerations > >(eg 100 - 600kt between 00.39 and 00.41hrs) were noted. > >And while the 't=E9moins au sol' kept seeing lights, the pilots > >never made visual contact, and the ground reports of the > >position of the lights seem not to match what was appearing > >on the radars. > >Someone has scribbled "brouillage" (confusion) in the margin of > >this copy - which seems to me the best summary of the case so far. > >Keep taking the pills, Henny. Or (te he) try eating dates. > Duke, > You can babble on as long as you like. I'll start eating pills > against turning red and running out of breath by the mere > thought of supersonic balloons (I'll be forever in your debt > for that one). I went to review the original report from Col W. De Brouwer after James Easton posted his relevant excerpts from it in his previous post. I thought I 'd post the report in it's entirety here starting with the conclusions: Source: http://members.tripod.com/~butwww/BelgUFOReport2.htm Conclusions 12. The BELGIAN Airforce was unable to identify neither the nature nor the origin of the phenomena. However, it had sufficient elements to exclude following assumptions: a. Balloons. Impossible due to the highly variable speeds (confirmed visually and by radar). b. ULM. Same as for balloons. c. RPV. Impossible due to the hovering characteristics. d. Aircraft (including Stealth). Same as for RPV. No noise. e. Laser projections or Mirages. Unlikely due to lack of projection surface (no clouds). Light spots have been observed from different locations. Light spots moved over distance of more than 15 NM. Form of inlighted part of spots has been observed with spectacles. Laser projections or mirages can not be detected by radar. SUMMARY REPORT ON OBSERVATIONS Official report of Col W. De Brouwer - 30,31 March 1990 Background 1. Starting early Dec 89 the BAF has been contacted on several occasions by eyewitnesses who observed strange phenomena in the Belgian airspace. On some occassions they described the phenomena as a triangle-shaped platform up to 200 feet wide with 3 downward beaming projectors, hovering at +- 100 m above the ground and making only a very light humming noise. Some witnesses saw the object departing at very high speed after a very fast acceleration. All observations were made in the evening or during the night. 2. The radarstations which had been alerted by eyewitnesses could not definitely determine a correlation between the visual observations and their detections on radar. On two occasions the BAF scrambled 2 F16 during the evening hours. a.On the first occasion the F16 arrived +- 1 hour after the visual detection. Nothing was observed. b. On the second occassion, pilots could identify a laser-beam projector on the ground. After investigation it appeared however that the description of the observations totally differed from previously described phenomena. 3. Consequently the Belgian Airforce, anxious to identify the origin of the phenomena, authorised F16 scrambles if following conditions were met: a. Visual observations on the ground confirmed by the local police. b. Detection on radar. Events 4. On 30 Mar 1990 at 23.00 Hr the Master Controller (MC) of the Air Defence radar station of Glons received a phone call from a person who declared to observe three independant blinking lights in the sky, changing colours, with a much higher intensity than the lights of the stars and forming a triangle. Meteo conditions were clear sky, no clouds, light wind and a minor temperature inversion at 3000 Ft. 5. The MC in turn notified the police of WAVRE which confirmed the sighting at +- 23 30 Hr. Meanwhile the MC had identified a radar contact at about 8 NM North of the ground observation. The contact moved slowely to the West at a speed of =- 25kts and an altitude of 10.000 Ft. 6. The ground observers reported 3 additional light spots which moved gradually, with irregular speeds, towards the first set of lights and forming a second triangle. 7. At 23.50 a second radar station, situated at +- 100 NM >from the first, confirmed an identical contact at the same place of the radar contact of Glons. 8. At 00.05 Hr 2 F16 were scrambled from BEAUVECHAIN airbase and guided towards the radar contacts. A total of 9 interception attempts have been made. At 6 occasions the pilots could establish a lock-on with their air interception radar. Lock-on distances varried between 5 and 8 NM. On all occasions targets varied speed and altitude very quickly and break-locks occured after 10 to 60 seconds. Speeds varied between 150 and 1010 kts. At 3 occasions both F16 registered simultaneous lock-ons with the same parameters. The 2 F16 were flying +- 2 NM apart. No visual contact could be established by either of the F16 pilots. 9. The F16 flew 3 times through the observation field of the ground observers. At the third passage the ground observers notified a change in the behaviour of the light spots. The most luminous started to blink very intensively while the other disappeared. Consequently, the most luminous spot started to dim gradually. 10. Meanwhile the head of the police of WAVRE had alerted 4 other police stations in the area. All four, seperated +- 10 NM from each other, confirmed the visual observations. 11. The aircraft landed at 01.10 Hrs. The last visual observation was recorded at +- 01.30 Hrs.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp