UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1997 > Nov > Nov 11

Re: "Catch 'em in the act" research

From: jpeterson@polaristel.net [Candy Peterson]
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 97 11:22:14 PST
Fwd Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 20:49:53 -0500
Subject: Re: "Catch 'em in the act" research


>Date: Tue, 11 Nov 1997 08:48:48 -0500
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Bob Shell <76750.2717@compuserve.com>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: "Catch 'em in the act" research

>>From: jpeterson@polaristel.net [Candy Peterson]
>>Date: Mon, 10 Nov 97 23:57:49 PST
>>Subject: "Catch 'em in the act" research
>>To: UFO UpDates <updates@globalserve.net>


>>I'm a field investigator and researcher with Minnesota MUFON.
>>We're compiling a list of known attempts to authenticate
>>the source(s) -- ET or otherwise -- of UFO/alien abductions.

>>There are many anecdotal accounts of camera malfunction and
>>various forms of interference. The commonly held opinion is
>>that "they" simply can't be caught in the act by our relatively
>>primitive recording devices.

>Candy,

>I think just the opposite may be true.  It is, perhaps, the
>sophistication of our recording devices that is the problem.

>Nearly all modern cameras use electronic systems to control
>their operation.  Such systems are vulnerable to disruption by
>strong EMF.  In earlier days with completely mechanical
>cameras, I don't think this was a problem.

>I have suggested for some time that it may well be impossible
>to get close range images of UFOs with modern still cameras or
>video cameras.  I have suggested that serious UFO investigators
>should be equipped with completely mechanical cameras.

Thanks, Bob.

Those pesky EM effects have been known for a long time, so there
is reason to think that inventive people worldwide have tried to
record the visitations/abductions in many different ways.

At Minnesota MUFON we're searching for the data of any attempts
to record the abduction phenomena, whether through the use of
wind-up cameras, modern recording equipment of various kinds,
home-made passive detectors, even watchdogs or human witnesses.
The list of potential methods is endless, considering human
ingenuity in the face of this mystery.

What is important is to see what we can learn from analysis of
the attempts, whether they ended in failure, defeat, or some
measure of success.

Please contribute documentation to this ongoing scientific
effort.

Thanks!

Candy Peterson
jpeterson@polaristel.net

---------------------------------
Minnesota MUFON
http://www.wavefront.com/~jhenry/
---------------------------------




Search for other documents from or mentioning: jpeterson | 76750.2717

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com