UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1997 > Nov > Nov 15

Re: ETH [Extra Terrestrial Hypothesis] &c

From: rfsignal@sprynet.com [Cathy Johnson]
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 08:45:17 -0800
Fwd Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 13:19:50 -0500
Subject: Re: ETH [Extra Terrestrial Hypothesis] &c

>Date: Thu, 13 Nov 1997 09:29:26 +0200
>From: Jakes Louw <LOUWJE@telkom.co.za>
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: UFO UpDate: Re:  ETH [Extra Terrestrial Hypothesis] &c

>>From: rfsignal@sprynet.com [Cathy Johnson]
>>Date: Wed, 12 Nov 1997 06:40:29 -0800
>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: ETH [Extra Terrestrial Hypothesis] &c
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>

Dear Jakes,

I am sorry that you think I am continually bitching about
abductions.  You are right.  There is a lot more than abductions
to be concerned about on this list.

>I have no problem whatsoever with people who have had some
>experience, whether a sighting or abduction. How could I,
>and who am I to judge.

If you don't, don't worry. Others are doing it for you.

>HOWEVER: I have a problem with people who continually
>bitch about the fact that UFO "research" isn't taken
>seriously by the scientific community. Perhaps they
>should look at that statement. Apart from some
>questionable US government reports (Condon, Blue
>Book, whatever), where are the scientific papers?
>All we get are pseudo-scientific popular fiction
>novels: "My brain was removed by little green men".

Above top secret.  I would have to shoot you if I told you
everything.  What a lame excuse for this to be foisted in the
face of a population as large as that in North America.  The
Russians have the same trouble as Americans when it comes to
ufology.  Don't you think they could compare notes at least?
Afterall, the cold war is over.

The McCarthy era is dead and buried.  What other excuses?

>Now very possibly, although statistically highly
>improbably, 4 million US citizens have been
>abducted. OK.

Really? I didn't know the estimated number at all. I will keep it
as a handy reference.  Thankyou.

>But surely out of all these cases, there is ONE
>with sufficient evidence.

There won't be if the government is actively suppressing the
information concerning UFOs and their occupants.  All we can get
to see is that there about four million people who are crying
wolf about something that the governments of the world won't even
consider as a possibility.  So, the four million people in North
America are ignored, along with everyone else in the world who
has had sightings or experiences.  That's how it is.

Whatever anyone may think about all of this, has nothing to do
about what is actually going on.  Who knows the real truth?  Is
it the people who had the original sightings or experiences?  Or
is it the government, who is so surgical in controlling all of
the information about the whole picture?  Who does know the truth
of the matter?

>Out of all the sightings in the US, surely there
>is ONE that has all the evidence required for
>it to be considered interesting by main-stream

Look at any case and judge the believability factor.  Does it
indicate that there are factors in the case that may or may not
present information that would be socially, politically, or
religously  significant?  And, if it does, then it should be kept
quiet until all of the necessary social, political, and religous
adjustments can be made.  The War of the Worlds is really a
fearful battle of present day beliefs and technologies struggling
to adapt to survive the implications of the possibilities and
ramifications of an alien presence.

>I dunno. Maybe I'm just naive in thinking that
>this is possible.

What makes you think you are so different than anyone else here?
Don't you think we all want answers to our questions?  Well, it
won't happen until the powers that be will decide otherwise.

Consider that Freedom of Information Access documents are on the
Internet.  These refer to all kinds of secrets, even ones going
back to the days of nuclear development.  Any references to UFOs
in them?  Not a word.  Lots of implications, lots of rumours
only.  I know it only makes me suspicious of the kind of
information we are being fed.  How would you feel if you thought
you knew something and the government denied it to your face?
Begin to know how I feel.

Take care for now,
Cathy Johnson

Search for other documents from or mentioning: rfsignal | louwje

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com