UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1997 > Nov > Nov 17

Re: Belgian Radar-Visual

From: Henny van der Pluijm <hvdp@worldonline.nl>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 18:56:01 +0100 (MET)
Fwd Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 01:59:13 -0500
Subject: Re: Belgian Radar-Visual

>Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 15:21:39 -0500
>From: Peregrine Mendoza <101653.2205@compuserve.com> [Peter Brookesmith]
>Subject: Re: Belgian Radar-Visual
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>

>With the compliments of the Duke of Mendoza:

>>Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 03:37:53 +0100 (MET)
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>From: Henny van der Pluijm <hvdp@worldonline.nl>
>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Belgian Radar-Visual

>What I remember is this, from someone who has slightly better
>claim than you to be an authority on the case:

>>Date: Thu, 06 Nov 1997 11:44:47 +0100
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>From: Christophe Meessen <meessen@cppm.in2p3.fr>
>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Belgian Radar-Visual

>Here some relevant paragraphs:

>>Now about the F16 radar echoes. This was intensively studied and
>>compared with previous studies. This event had ground visual
>>observations by different gendarmes (policemens) at different
>>location, ground radar echoes from civilian and military and of
>>course the F16 radar recordings. But even with all these
>>extraordinar conjuction of evidences, all of them could be
>>explained by conventional phenomenon. This does not mean there
>>was not an UFO, but it means that the question becomes

Christophe also said:

'My father proposed an explanation for all radar related



'So to me what happened in Belgium these two years remain an
unsolved mystery and the proposed explanation for radar evidence
hardly scratch the mystery.'

>But Henny persists:

>>Remember my remarks about a triangular object that had been
>>witnessed at the exact same spot where the F16s detected the
>>erratic signal?

Which would explain the mystery better than any other

>Yes, but see above. And did the eyewitnesses report the UFO
>performing the same merry capers as appeared on the radar? I
>think not.

No, and the aliens didn't wave back either.

>I also recall that you refused to do some background
>reading on radar, lest the purity of your premature conclusions
>be contaminated by giving (unasked, as it happens) pleasure to
>one you caricature as a debunker.

You have to improve your remote viewing skills, Duke.
I did do background reading, only not from the Blue Book
crap that Eduardo suggested. (The silence from Italy is
deafening after I asked Eduaro for specifics about the
temperature inversion).

So, again:

>>no matter how many times the facts are pointed out of
>>a solid case, some people are capable of producing an
>>infinite amount of bogus to attack the case.

           /    Met vriendelijke groet/Best wishes    \
                      Henny van der Pluijm

                       Technology Pages

Search for other documents from or mentioning: hvdp | 101653.2205 | meessen

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com