UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1997 > Nov > Nov 17

Re: Belgian Radar-Visual

From: Henny van der Pluijm <hvdp@worldonline.nl>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 18:56:01 +0100 (MET)
Fwd Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 01:59:13 -0500
Subject: Re: Belgian Radar-Visual


>Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 15:21:39 -0500
>From: Peregrine Mendoza <101653.2205@compuserve.com> [Peter Brookesmith]
>Subject: Re: Belgian Radar-Visual
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>


>With the compliments of the Duke of Mendoza:

>>Date: Sat, 15 Nov 1997 03:37:53 +0100 (MET)
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>From: Henny van der Pluijm <hvdp@worldonline.nl>
>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Belgian Radar-Visual


>What I remember is this, from someone who has slightly better
>claim than you to be an authority on the case:

>>Date: Thu, 06 Nov 1997 11:44:47 +0100
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>From: Christophe Meessen <meessen@cppm.in2p3.fr>
>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Belgian Radar-Visual

>Here some relevant paragraphs:

>>Now about the F16 radar echoes. This was intensively studied and
>>compared with previous studies. This event had ground visual
>>observations by different gendarmes (policemens) at different
>>location, ground radar echoes from civilian and military and of
>>course the F16 radar recordings. But even with all these
>>extraordinar conjuction of evidences, all of them could be
>>explained by conventional phenomenon. This does not mean there
>>was not an UFO, but it means that the question becomes
>>undecidable.

Christophe also said:

'My father proposed an explanation for all radar related
evidences.'

Note PROPOSED.

And:

'So to me what happened in Belgium these two years remain an
unsolved mystery and the proposed explanation for radar evidence
hardly scratch the mystery.'

>But Henny persists:

>>Remember my remarks about a triangular object that had been
>>witnessed at the exact same spot where the F16s detected the
>>erratic signal?

Which would explain the mystery better than any other
explanation.

>Yes, but see above. And did the eyewitnesses report the UFO
>performing the same merry capers as appeared on the radar? I
>think not.

No, and the aliens didn't wave back either.

>I also recall that you refused to do some background
>reading on radar, lest the purity of your premature conclusions
>be contaminated by giving (unasked, as it happens) pleasure to
>one you caricature as a debunker.

You have to improve your remote viewing skills, Duke.
I did do background reading, only not from the Blue Book
crap that Eduardo suggested. (The silence from Italy is
deafening after I asked Eduaro for specifics about the
temperature inversion).

So, again:

>>no matter how many times the facts are pointed out of
>>a solid case, some people are capable of producing an
>>infinite amount of bogus to attack the case.


            __________________________________________
           /    Met vriendelijke groet/Best wishes    \
                      Henny van der Pluijm
		      hvdp@worldonline.nl

                       Technology Pages
                http://home.worldonline.nl/~hvdp
             \______________________________________/



Search for other documents from or mentioning: hvdp | 101653.2205 | meessen

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com