From: Steven Kaeser <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:13:16 -0500 Fwd Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 07:58:20 -0500 Subject: Re: ...one of my visitors was listed as 'USA >Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 06:56:49 +0100 (MET) >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> >From: Henny van der Pluijm <firstname.lastname@example.org> >Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: ...one of my visitors was listed as 'USA Government' >>Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 19:42:05 +0000 >>From: Dave Ledger <email@example.com> >>To: firstname.lastname@example.org >>Subject: Question >>Hello Errol & List, >>I am using a webcounter at the site to monitor the traffic etc >>and when I was reading through the feedback results, which inform >>you as to the user, their web browser, operating system etc. I >>noticed that one of my visitors was listed as 'USA Government'. While I use my private email provider to send email, I sometimes browse the "net" while on break at work (at the U.S. House). I stopped using my work email address when it began to raise eyebrows, but can't do anything (easily) to mask my domain. To be honest, I would be more curious if the domain was .mil, which would indicate that it was a military domain in the U.S. that had made contact, rather than a basic .gov (which can relate to a local government agency). >If there is a UFO cover up in the USA, and I think there is, >the odds are roughly that only one in 100,000 US government >workers know the details. He/she would not worry about a >single UFO website out of the 10,000 that there are >already are which - by the way - don't affect the cover up >in the least. I could go on about the UFO community being >far more damaging to openness about this subject than the >cover up itself, but I'll stop here. >In any case, don't worry. I would suggest that US Government is being used in a very generic way here, and there are those who might suggest that few government workers have any knowledge of the "cover-up" and that much of the research is now being handled by private concerns under contract with the government. I don't think this can easily be boiled down to a simple black and white issue, and while I would agree that a cover-up exists, to attribute it to the "government" is IMHO overly broad and misleading.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp