UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1997 > Nov > Nov 24

Re: The Roper Poll - David Jacobs Clarifies

From: Jim Deardorff <deardorj@ucs.orst.edu>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 19:19:14 -0800 (PST)
Fwd Date: Mon, 24 Nov 1997 09:19:30 -0500
Subject: Re: The Roper Poll - David Jacobs Clarifies

> Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 13:21:30 -0500
> From: "David M. Jacobs" <djacobs@thunder.ocis.temple.edu>
> To: updates@globalserve.net
> Subject: The Roper Poll

> Hello Everyone,

> I thought I might peek into the List for a while to see how
> things are going.  I am afraid that I probably will not be able
> to contribute much--especially in the coming months--but perhaps
> I can put in my two cents worth every once in a while.

> I am responding to Jim Deardorff and Dennis Stacy and others who
> were discussing the Roper Poll of 1991.  I was not sure of who
> said what in the e-mail sent to me so I will be somewhat generic
> in my comments.

> The Roper Poll was an omnibus poll in which an actual person
> with clipboard in hand went to the homes of scientifically chosen
> randomly selected individuals.  The questions asked about unusual
> experiences followed a series of questions about political
> opinions and other public matters.  The poll did not include
> frivolous questions or questions about products or advertising.
> Thus, the seriousness of the questions about unusual experiences
> was inherent in the context of the other questions.

> As far as I am aware, the total number of people who were asked
> the questions were the ones who responded.  I personally do not
> have knowledge of others who were asked and failed to respond,
> although I suppose that there must have been a few who remained
> silent during this part of the omnibus questioning.  Roper
> informed us that there were three two-thousand person sweeps in
> the summer of 1991.  I am not exactly sure why the number did not
> come out to exactly 6,000 people; perhaps these were the silent
> ones.

Hello Dave,

Welcome to the list!  Thanks for filling us in on this information.

It would seem, then, that the pollsters didn't tell the
participant about the "unsusual aspects" portion of the poll in
advance.  In that case, the difference between 6000 and 5947 may
indeed be indicative of the number who declined to participate
further after this section of the poll was reached.  In that
case, however, the possible bias I was concerned about would
indeed be negligible.

I do notice that for some of the Report's questions there were
5946 responses obtained, and for others 5948, so I suppose they
did have to accept some responses that overlooked answering a
question, or where the respondent wasn't sure of which of two
categories to place the answer in, etc.

Jim Deardorff

Search for other documents from or mentioning: deardorj | djacobs

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com