UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1998 > Jul > Jul 1

Re: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers'

From: bruce maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 07:54:47 -0400
Fwd Date: Wed, 01 Jul 1998 17:13:52 -0400
Subject: Re: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers'

>Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 17:06:57 +0100
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: John Rimmer <johnr@magonia.demon.co.uk>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers'

>>Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 15:50:32 -0300
>>From: "Stanton T. Friedman" <fsphys@brunnet.net>
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers'

>>It is almost impossible to deal rationally with someone who makes
>>the absurd claim "We all know that no alien craft crashed at
>>Roswell and that MJ-12 is a fake." I know a number of scientists
>>who accept neither conclusion. .. so your claim is obviously


>Could we have some details of these scientists, such as their
>names and qualifications to make judgements on MJ12 and Roswell?
>Have they published anything on these topics?

I have read the arguments pro and con...including the "dummy
drop" theory of Roswell..... and I say the case is still open. I
can't prove that what crashed was actually an alien spaceship...
but on the other hand, I don't buy the Mogul theory, either.
Moreover, with Marcel's testimony of nearly 20 years ago now
(and rejecting claims of how "untrsutworthy" he was), I would
say the evidence is still weighted on the side of "not made
here" (and not in Germany and not in the Soviet Union).