UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1998 > Jul > Jul 6

Re: Mexico City Fake [was: Lindemann & Rense Tidy

From: bruce maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 1998 23:00:36 -0400
Fwd Date: Mon, 06 Jul 1998 10:04:07 -0400
Subject: Re: Mexico City Fake [was: Lindemann & Rense Tidy


>Date: Sat, 4 Jul 1998 16:34:15 -0700 (PDT)
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>,
>From: Jim Deardorff <deardorj@proaxis.com>
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Lindemann & Rense Tidy Up

>>Date: Sat, 4 Jul 1998 10:47:24 -0400
>>From: bruce maccabee <brumac@compuserve.com>
>>Subject: UFO UpDate: Re: Lindemann & Rense Tidy Up
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>

>Bruce wrote:

[...]

[...]

>Say Bruce,

>What if you were to allow for the following possibilities; would
>a possible explanation then come to mind?

>(a) Some UFO entities are able to cause a person to do something
i>nvoluntarily. Such as to look up for no apparent reason from
>what they're doing and spot a UFO in a certain part of the sky.
>.Some are reportedly able to affect equipment at a distance, such .
>as remotely clicking a camera's shutter. Causing equipment
>malfunction could be related, especially when an automobile's
>engine suddenly comes back on again, etc.

>(b) UFOs are capable of nearly instantaneous accelerations within
>our time frame, and at the same time very controlled motions and
>displacements, such as the UFO that was once reportedly filmed to
>make a tight circle around a speeding rocket, or UFOs that charge
t>owards autos or airplanes and at the last split second avoid
>collision.

>(c) UFO entities like to toy with us at times, often with an
>apparent goal of leaving crumbs for skeptics to latch onto.>

>Would these and related considerations cause you to rethink
>making the assumption that the Mexican City UFO was moving
>uniformly along a single trajectory? Or do such considerations
>just bring to mind the attitude of: "If what you imply were the
>case, what's the use of studying them?"


I suppose if UFOs could do anything we couldn't rule out a video
that shows a UFO with a line above it...since the UFO could have
created the line within the elctronics of the camera to fool us.

In the Mex. Ciuty video..what really attracted Sainio's attention
was the remarkable correlation between the motion of the camera
and the motion of the UFO. That is, if the camera moved up, the
UFO moved up, etc.  This tracking was not perfect but very good
implying that either (a) the UFO knew which way the camera was
about to move and adjusted its position in the sky accordingly or
(b) the UFO modified the electronic signal within the camera to
make it appear to move with the camera. An alternative is that
the presumed hoaxer wasn't perfectly accurate in compensating for
camera motion when he electronically pasted the UFO image onto
the (presumed) real video background (that had been obtained
first, so the UFO could be added later).