UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1998 > Jun > Jun 3

Re: Examination of Roswell Photos Clears Air Force

From: John Velez <jvif@spacelab.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 03:17:26 -0500
Fwd Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 21:24:33 -0400
Subject: Re: Examination of Roswell Photos Clears Air Force

>From: ufotruth@ix.netcom.com [William Hand]
>Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 07:48:14 -0500 (CDT)
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Examination of Roswell Photos Clears Air Force

>>Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 01:15:44 -0500
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>From: John <jvif@spacelab.net>
>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Examination of Roswell Photos Clears Air Force
>> General


>>Hi All,

>>Stan, Kevin (or anyone else on the list who has researched the
>>Roswell case) is this new photo enlargement development
>>anything that we can/should get excited about?
>>John Velez

William responds:

>It is just more bull. They are trying to claim that the weather
>balloon Junk that Ramey showed in his office to the press was the
>real debris found days earlier that was mistaken as debris from a
>flying disk.

Unless I misread the post they claim that the enlargements show
the "I-beam(s)" that Maj.Marcel had mentioned with the "bas
relief" raised characters showing on them. The post also mentions
the presence of "plastic" or a plastic like material which did
not exist in 1947. That's why I was asking guys like Kevin and
Stan to comment. I'm curious if it's more "smoke" or "smoking
gun."

And BTW Bill, it hasn't (yet) been determined that (any disc)
terrestrial or otherwise crashed at Roswell! It's what we're all
trying to determine.

>Well, there is NO WAY that any military officer, or
>even a child, could mistake the burnt weather balloon JUNK in
>Ramey's office as debris from a crashed flying disk. It is just
>IMPOSSIBLE.

Yer making some mighty big assumptions here.

>It does not matter how much they zoom the images it will
>only show more details of the fake weather balloon junk
>that let the press photograph after he had the REAL
>ET debris taken out.

Were you there? You sound so certain about the sequence of
events. ET's, saucer debris, again you make huge "assumptions."
Let's give this photo biz a good going over and a chance to be
checked out thoroghly before you hit the streets chanting,
"They've landed!" <G>

No-one (more than I) would like to see some "proof" that it's
ET's and saucers, but I'm not going to abandon/lose my common
sense and ability to apply a little critical thinking in the
process. I (think/believe) that we're dealing with an
extraterrestrial force/agent - but that's just "my belief."
No-one knows for sure with any degree of certainty. Not even you
Mr Hand.

I'd still like to hear Stans' estimation of these new photo
enlargements. We've already heard what Kevin thinks of the
photographer and his testimony. Which was pretty compelling stuff
Mr Randle! Thank you for posting it.

Peace,

John Velez




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com