UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1998 > Jun > Jun 5

Re: Examination of Roswell Photos Clears Air Force

From: RGates8254@aol.com [Robert Gates]
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 01:54:45 EDT
Fwd Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 10:04:21 -0400
Subject: Re: Examination of Roswell Photos Clears Air Force


>  Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:36:17 -0500 (CDT)
>  To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>  From: Dennis Stacy <dstacy@texas.net>
>  Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Examination of Roswell Photos Clears Air
>           Force General

>  >>From: KRandle993@aol.com [Kevin Randle]
>  >>Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 12:58:31 EDT
>  >>To: updates@globalserve.net
>  >>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Examination of Roswell Photos Clears
>  >>                         Air Force General

>  >In essence told one story on tape in 1989 (before he was well
>  >known in the UFO side of life) THEN after almost 9 years of being
>  >exposed to various Roswell tales storys, hype, theories and
>  >otherwise, he is now telling a different story as he has become
>  >more known.

>  >This is very similar to other Roswell witnesses who fingered "the
>  >crash site" as being in one place, then when fame/money/or other
>  >reasons come along they change their story to fit the current
>  >situtation. As I recall we are up to 5-7 "this is the crash
>  >site..." locations around Roswell.

>  Kevin:

>  I appreciate that you finally appreciate the problem. But we only
>  have to extrapolate your argument one step further to cast
>  serious  aspersions on any number of allegedly original stories.
>  In other words, why should Jim Ragsdale's _first_ story be taken
>  at face value in light of subsequent ditherings and changes? Why
>  not assume he was dissembling -- cashing in on potential fame &
>  money -- to begin with? Ditto Frank Kaufmann and Frankie Rowe,
>  or, for that matter, Glenn Dennis.

>  Yes, we now have some 5-7 claimed crash sites. Perhaps you and
>  Stanton Friedman would like to apportion part of the blame for
>  same between you? Failing that, maybe you could just tell us
>  which crash site is the real one, and which fakes we should
>  avoid. After all, at $15 a pop, this stuff adds up pretty
>  quickly. Friedman is welcome to annoint his favorite crash site
>  as well, or sites, as the case may be. And of course you both
>  remain free to assign different dates to the many crashes, too.
>  If in doubt about any of the above, I cordially suggest you
>  consult The Day After Roswell by Mssrs. Cor$o and Birne$ for
>  definitive details, a move which should allay at least one or two
>  of my critics.

Dennis,

Before you blither and blather on, you owe Kevin a giant apology.
 For had you carefully read the message you would have discovered
that it was in fact me that you are responding to, not Kevin
Randle.  As for Corso and tend to disbelive his story BUT I am
willing to wait and see what the CAUS lawsuit turns up.  It might
be real interesting.

Cheers,
Robert


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com