UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1998 > Jun > Jun 7

Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General

From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 15:48:19 EDT
Fwd Date: Sun, 07 Jun 1998 21:03:01 -0400
Subject: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General


>From: RTodd12191@aol.com
>Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 10:23:35 EDT
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General


>>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com>
>>Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 15:48:21 EDT
>>To: updates@globalserve.net
>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General

>>>From: Robert Todd <RTodd12191@aol.com>
>>>Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 14:58:39 EDT
>>>To: updates@globalserve.net
>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General

><snip>


>>>And I ask again, why is it we haven't been told what Mrs. Marcel
>>>(Major Marcel's wife, and Jesse Marcel, Jr.'s mother) had to say
>>>when she was asked about the Roswell debris? As I undestand it,
>>>she said the debris was _not_ from an alien spaceship. This is
>>>just one of numerous examples where the promoters of the alien
>>>spaceship explanation have distoted, misrepresented, or hidden
>>>evidence that runs counter to the alien spaceship explanation.

>>When I spoke to Mrs. Marcel (Major Marcel's wife, and Jesse
>>Marcel, Jr's mother) she said that she had handled material from
>>an alien spacecraft. She also said that she had accompanied her
>>husband to the debris field. It was clear at the time I spoke to
>>her, that she did not have a clear memory of the events and
>>nothing positive would be gained from reporting what she said
>>then.

>Given the fact that Mr. Randle has distorted and misrepresented
>so many facts in the past, without corroboration in the form of
>a tape recorded interview, I am not willing to rely solely on
>Mr. Randle's claims.

Others have said the same thing. Dr. Marcel would, of course,
corroborate the statement as well. However, don't we have this
backwards? Mr. Todd wrote, "As I undestand it, she said the
debris was _not_ from an alien spaceship." There is no source for
this "understanding." I provided my reason for not mentioning
what she said, which is in conflict with what is alleged here.
Shouldn't Mr. Todd be required to explain where this information
came from, and if he has no source, then shouldn't we just ignore
it as irrelevant.

And can't we just say asked and answered. He might not like the
answer, but it explains why her testimony was not used.

KRandle


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com