From: Stanton T. Friedman <email@example.com> Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 07:32:23 -0300 Fwd Date: Mon, 08 Jun 1998 21:40:13 -0400 Subject: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General > From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com> > Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 15:48:19 EDT > To: firstname.lastname@example.org > Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General > >From: RTodd12191@aol.com > >Date: Sun, 7 Jun 1998 10:23:35 EDT > >To: email@example.com > >Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General > >>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com> > >>Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 15:48:21 EDT > >>To: firstname.lastname@example.org > >>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General > >>>From: Robert Todd <RTodd12191@aol.com> > >>>Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 14:58:39 EDT > >>>To: email@example.com > >>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General > ><snip> > >>>And I ask again, why is it we haven't been told what Mrs. Marcel > >>>(Major Marcel's wife, and Jesse Marcel, Jr.'s mother) had to say > >>>when she was asked about the Roswell debris? As I undestand it, > >>>she said the debris was _not_ from an alien spaceship. This is > >>>just one of numerous examples where the promoters of the alien > >>>spaceship explanation have distoted, misrepresented, or hidden > >>>evidence that runs counter to the alien spaceship explanation. > >>When I spoke to Mrs. Marcel (Major Marcel's wife, and Jesse > >>Marcel, Jr's mother) she said that she had handled material from > >>an alien spacecraft. She also said that she had accompanied her > >>husband to the debris field. It was clear at the time I spoke to > >>her, that she did not have a clear memory of the events and > >>nothing positive would be gained from reporting what she said > >>then. > >Given the fact that Mr. Randle has distorted and misrepresented > >so many facts in the past, without corroboration in the form of > >a tape recorded interview, I am not willing to rely solely on > >Mr. Randle's claims. > Others have said the same thing. Dr. Marcel would, of course, > corroborate the statement as well. However, don't we have this > backwards? Mr. Todd wrote, "As I undestand it, she said the > debris was _not_ from an alien spaceship." There is no source for > this "understanding." I provided my reason for not mentioning > what she said, which is in conflict with what is alleged here. > Shouldn't Mr. Todd be required to explain where this information > came from, and if he has no source, then shouldn't we just ignore > it as irrelevant. > And can't we just say asked and answered. He might not like the > answer, but it explains why her testimony was not used. > KRandle When I visited Mr. and Mrs. Jesse Marcel Sr in Houma, Louisiana, in 1979, it was certainly my impression that Mrs. Marcel thought the material was very strange indeed. It is my impression that Mr. Todd hasn't met with any of the people involved in this story except Captain McAndrew. Armchair Theorizing isn't the same as the kind of field investigation that Kevin and I have been doing for many years on this case.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp