UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1998 > Jun > Jun 9

Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General

From: "Steven Kaeser" <steve@konsulting.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 06:45:54 -0400
Fwd Date: Tue, 09 Jun 1998 08:16:15 -0400
Subject: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General

>From: Robert Todd <RTodd12191@aol.com>
>Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 12:55:33 EDT
>To: updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General

>> From: "Steven Kaeser" <steve@konsulting.com>
>> To: "UFO UpDates - Toronto" <updates@globalserve.net>
>> Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General
>> Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 22:14:07 -0400

>> >From: Robert Todd <RTodd12191@aol.com>
>> >Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 14:58:39 EDT
>> >To: updates@globalserve.net
>> >Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Roswell Photos Clears Air Force General

>> <Robert Todd response deleted for brevity>


>> >Perhaps Mr. Kaeser could tell us at which "numerous events"
>> >Prof. Moore has "share[d] his 'truth'"?

>> His comments offered at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and
>> Technology (NMIMT) were posted to the Internet several years ago,
>> and the book you mentioned that he co-authored was released about
>> a year or so after that. It seems that Prof. Moore felt the need
>> to speak about the subject at some level, but I certainly
>> wouldn't compare his involvement to that of UFO proponents.

>So, according to your information, the "numerous events" total
>two. Impressive.

Indeed. Moving from obscurity to the level of speaker, and then
to writer. This appears to show a pattern that indicates that he
no longer can truly be considered to be a dis-interested
scientist examining the evidence.  No, I'm not claiming that he
is now a flaming skeptic who seeks out forums to spread his

>I would like to think I had something to do with Prof. Moore
>agreeing to co-author the book. I thought the information he put
>in that book was important, and should be on the record for the
>public to find somewhere. It also was an opportunity to clear up
>some of the mistakes that crept into the Air Force's first
>Roswell report. I see absolutely nothing wrong with Prof.
>Moore's motivations in deciding to do the book, which, even
>then, was done reluctantly. Contrary to the picture you paint of
>Prof. Moor'e activities, he is quite disinterested in the
>subject of Roswell, and he feels he has said all he can and
>needs to say on the subject.

From what I've seen, Prof. Moore has led an exciting life and
should be given every opportunity to pursue whatever he wants at
this stage of his life.  I've no idea why he would want to expose
himself to, or become involved in, the crazy genre of ufology.


>> That is not the way Dr. Marcel portrayed the meeting during a
>> presentation in Roswell last year, but how the meeting came about
>> isn't really an issue.

>Neither I nor Prof. Moore exercises any control over how Dr.
>Marcel portrays any of the facts, real and imagined, he chooses
>to discuss in public. Prof. Moore was quite emphatic that he had
>never contacted Dr. Marcel. I know Captain McAndrew contacted
>Dr. Marcel, but not Prof. Moore. Perhaps he or you are confusing
>the two.

I have forwarded a query to Dr. Marcel, and will correct my
statement if you are correct.


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com