From: bruce maccabee <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 01:08:42 -0400 Fwd Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 20:47:56 -0400 Subject: Re: Occam's Razor and UFOs >Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:25:13 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time) >From: Nick Balaskas <nikolaos@YorkU.CA> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> >Subject: UFO UpDate: Re: Occam's Razor and UFOs >Greetings, >To all those who participated in this on going discussion on >Occam's Razor and UFOs (and those who did not but might like >to), can anyone tell me who correctly applied Occam's Razor to t>he two very similiar E.T. related cases below? <snip> >Can we really conclude that one specimen is of E.T. origin while >another is not if the assumptions made and the tests performed >are identical? This Physics Today article may turn out to be a >very important one for ufology. If not, at least it does show >that interstellar visits are possible (after all, unintelligent >rock particles can do it).>> >Nick Balaskas HAW HAW HAW. As I said before, Occam's Razor is a double edged blade. It cuts both ways.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp