UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1998 > Jun > Jun 27

Re: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers'

From: Tim Matthews <matthews@zetnet.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 08:10:04 +0100
Fwd Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 09:11:57 -0400
Subject: Re: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers'


> From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
> To: updates@globalserve.net
> Subject: UFO UpDate: Re: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers'
> Date: 26 June 1998 16:35

> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 08:30:36 -0300
> From: Stanton T. Friedman <fsphys@brunnet.net>
> To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
> Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers'

> > Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:44:42 -0400
> > From: The Duke of Mendoza <101653.2205@compuserve.com>
> > Subject: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers'
> > To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>

> > With the Duke's compliments:

> > >Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 23:02:35 -0400
> > >From: James Easton <pulsar@compuserve.com>
> > >Subject: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers'
> > >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>

> > >Regarding...

> > >>Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 20:17:16 -0300
> > >>From: Stanton T. Friedman <fsphys@brunnet.net>
> > >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
> > >>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Who is Jerome Clark?

> > Thanks, James. And while you wait for me to gather a few
> > last items necessary to continue my musings on the identity
> > of Jerome Clark, here's one I prepared earlier:

> > Stan Friedman's "TOP SECRET/MAJIC" has a chapter on those
> > who have been negative about the MJ-12 documents, and in it
> > Friedman shares with us his Top Ten "debunker principles of
> > logic, gleaned from many years of contact with them". It is
> > interesting to compare these with Friedman's own practice
> > here and, occasionally, elsewhere.

> <snip>

> Peter, I guess you must still be upset at losing the l995 debate
> at Oxford University Debating Society.

> Thanks for approving of my bibliography in TOP SECRET/MAJIC.

> My goal in life is not to convince the extremists at either end
> of the opinion spectrum, but rather the 80% Healthy Agnostics.

> David Rudiak did a splendid job of point by point refutation of
> Bob Todd's vicious attack on Jesse Marcel.

> I cannot spend the time dealing with the rest though I might
> suggest you dig in to Disinformation. The English were great at
> it in WW 2.

And you're not bad at it either, Stanton. I think we all know by
now that no alien craft crashed at Roswell and that MJ-12 is a
fake. Incidentally, why haven't we heard anything from Ufologists
about other explanations for Roswell - for instance the USAF were
touting a story about experimental rocket-powered flying wing
aircraft coming down in New Mexico in 1947 a couple of years
ago???

After all there are, of course, several crash sites to choose
from, so the USAF might be right!

> I do have some splendid articles from New Mexico newspapers about
> the huge ammunition dump explosion in the early hours of July 16,
> l945. (Trinity Site).

What about the CIC documents that suggest a German-American
origin for 'flying saucers'?

Don't hear much about them either, do we?



[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com