From: Tim Matthews <email@example.com> Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 08:10:04 +0100 Fwd Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 09:11:57 -0400 Subject: Re: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers' > From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <firstname.lastname@example.org> > To: email@example.com > Subject: UFO UpDate: Re: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers' > Date: 26 June 1998 16:35 > Date: Fri, 26 Jun 1998 08:30:36 -0300 > From: Stanton T. Friedman <firstname.lastname@example.org> > To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> > Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers' > > Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 15:44:42 -0400 > > From: The Duke of Mendoza <firstname.lastname@example.org> > > Subject: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers' > > To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> > > With the Duke's compliments: > > >Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 23:02:35 -0400 > > >From: James Easton <firstname.lastname@example.org> > > >Subject: Friedman's Laws for 'Debunkers' > > >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> > > >Regarding... > > >>Date: Wed, 17 Jun 1998 20:17:16 -0300 > > >>From: Stanton T. Friedman <firstname.lastname@example.org> > > >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> > > >>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: Re: Who is Jerome Clark? > > Thanks, James. And while you wait for me to gather a few > > last items necessary to continue my musings on the identity > > of Jerome Clark, here's one I prepared earlier: > > Stan Friedman's "TOP SECRET/MAJIC" has a chapter on those > > who have been negative about the MJ-12 documents, and in it > > Friedman shares with us his Top Ten "debunker principles of > > logic, gleaned from many years of contact with them". It is > > interesting to compare these with Friedman's own practice > > here and, occasionally, elsewhere. > <snip> > Peter, I guess you must still be upset at losing the l995 debate > at Oxford University Debating Society. > Thanks for approving of my bibliography in TOP SECRET/MAJIC. > My goal in life is not to convince the extremists at either end > of the opinion spectrum, but rather the 80% Healthy Agnostics. > David Rudiak did a splendid job of point by point refutation of > Bob Todd's vicious attack on Jesse Marcel. > I cannot spend the time dealing with the rest though I might > suggest you dig in to Disinformation. The English were great at > it in WW 2. And you're not bad at it either, Stanton. I think we all know by now that no alien craft crashed at Roswell and that MJ-12 is a fake. Incidentally, why haven't we heard anything from Ufologists about other explanations for Roswell - for instance the USAF were touting a story about experimental rocket-powered flying wing aircraft coming down in New Mexico in 1947 a couple of years ago??? After all there are, of course, several crash sites to choose from, so the USAF might be right! > I do have some splendid articles from New Mexico newspapers about > the huge ammunition dump explosion in the early hours of July 16, > l945. (Trinity Site). What about the CIC documents that suggest a German-American origin for 'flying saucers'? Don't hear much about them either, do we?
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp