From: John Rimmer <magonia@magonia.demon.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 23:12:42 +0100
Fwd Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 20:53:16 -0400
Subject: Re: Regression Hypnosis: Should Ufology Take A


>From: Jim Mortellaro <Jsmortell@aol.com>
>Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 14:58:32 EDT
>Subject: Re: Regression Hypnosis: Should Ufology Take A Stand?
>To: updates@globalserve.net

>Once again you have selected only one example to present your
>case. Budd Hopkins has thousands. Many of which are multiple
>witness cases, as an example, the so called "Brooklyn Bridge"
>case which occured in Manhattan, not far from the Gripple Works,
>by the by.

Sorry, but the Linda Napolitano case is _not_ a multiple witness
case, despite all the hype. There is no person on earth - other
than Linda - who can stand up in front of us and say "I saw a
UFO abduct a woman out of her apartment window in in New York
City..."

There are only alleged messages from alleged witnesses. In terms
of first hand evidence, the Napolitano case is weaker than
Adamski and most of the contactees of the fifties. There is
_no-one_, repeat _no-one_, who I can talk to who will give me a
first-hand account of the case, other than Linda. If this is the
best the abductionists can come up with as a multi-witness case,
they may as well pack up now.

--
John Rimmer
www.magonia.demon.co.uk
Abandon hope all ye who press Enter here