UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1999 > Apr > Apr 15

Re: Regression Hypnosis: Should Ufology Take A

From: Sharon Kardol <sharon@hotmix.com.au>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 17:40:00 +0800
Fwd Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 18:29:32 -0400
Subject: Re: Regression Hypnosis: Should Ufology Take A


>From: Jenny Randles <nufon@currantbun.com>
>To: UFO UpDates - updates@globalserve.net
>Subject: Regression Hypnosis: Should Ufology Take A Stand?
>Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 16:17:28 +0100


<snip>

Hi Jenny,

I found your post very thought provoking.

>As a newcomer to the net, please excuse me if I do not follow
>proper etiquette. I am still learning. But I wanted to issue a
>comment on a major policy in force in the UK, which does not
>seem to have been adopted by any other country in the world
>(save, to some extent, parts of Scandinavia). That is the
>banning of the use of regression hypnosis as a viable way to
>explore alleged abductions.
>
>I appreciate how this seems to work like a magic key unlocking
>the secrets of a case and making a light in the sky into a
>fantastic alien contact. That is part of the problem, in fact.
>It has, of course, made a few reputations and fortunes as well.
>But is it what proper UFOlogists should be doing? Are we not, in
>fact, putting self interest ahead of what ought to be our
>primary duty - witness responsibility? As a community should we
>not be more willing to consider taking stands that may be tough
>on some but necessary?


Sure, absolutely, I agree.  In my opinion,
hypnosis has become the easy way to doing
research and getting results.  Chris Rutkowski
 mentioned -

From: Chris Rutkowski <rutkows@cc.UManitoba.CA>
Subject: Re: Regression Hypnosis: Should Ufology Take a Stand?
To: updates@globalserve.net
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 14:33:44 -0500 (CDT)


>From: Jenny Randles <nufon@currantbun.com>
>Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 16:17:28 +0100
>Fwd Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1999 13:50:44 -0400
>Subject: Regression Hypnosis: Should Ufology Take A Stand?

>Rather than "push the
>envelope" and explore the abductee's memories beyond conscious
>recall, the pyschologist has decided to work on relaxation
>techniques in order to help the abductee overcome his fears of
>"what's locked inside." With a lessening of the fear, the
>abductee may then _consciously_ recall more details.

This seems like a great and more reliable
alternative, but possibly slower, much slower
than hypnosis session.  It will always be the easy
way to coming up with details, whether true or false

It is extremely unfortunate that fully qualified
professional medical staff aren't always involved
Perhaps it is their lack of qualifications and
experience which maybe be tainting the process
and therefore the outcome.

>Comments requested, please,


Just my 2 cents, But is there really that
much that we can do besides being vocal?

>Jenny Randles


Cheers

SharonK

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com