UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1999 > Feb > Feb 3

Re: Premature Birth & Abduction?

From: Leanne Martin <leanne_martin@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 23:18:49 PST
Fwd Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 17:36:23 -0500
Subject: Re: Premature Birth & Abduction?


>From: Greg Sandow <gsandow@prodigy.net>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: Premature Birth & Abduction?
>Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 22:27:33 -0500

>>From: Leanne Martin <leanne_martin@hotmail.com>
>>To: updates@globalserve.net
>>Subject: Premature Birth & Abduction?
>>Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 18:47:30 PST

>>Is any one aware of any statistical link between premature birth
>>and claimants of abduction?

>>Or perhaps even late and C-section births?

>>Do researchers even bother to look at issues like these when
>>interviewing an 'abductee'?
>
>Why should they?
>
>The C-section issue came up when Alvin Lawson suggested that
>alleged abduction memories were really memories of birth. One of
>the many arguments against him was that no abductees could have
>been born with C-sections. (The other one, of course, was that
>nobody has ever proved that anyone remembers being born.)

Are you implying that people delivered by C-section have no
right to celebrate their 'birthda'?  <G>

>But why are you asking your question?

Looking at the techniques of 'abduction researchers' - do they
take things purely at face value or do they dig deeper?

Also, why not ask the question?

Regards,
Leanne  ];-)




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com