From: Tim Matthews <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1999 08:38:31 -0000 Fwd Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 07:50:27 -0500 Subject: Re: Bell Cuts-Off R.A.M. Stephens >Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 10:20:36 -0600 >From: Alfred Lehmberg <Lehmberg@snowhill.com> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> >Subject: Re: Bell Cuts-Off R.A.M. Stephens >>Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 02:28:00 +0000 >>From: Robert A. M. Stephens <firstname.lastname@example.org> >>To: <email@example.com>, >>Subject: They Cut Off Robert! >>[http://ww2.broadcast.com/artbell/archive98.html#dec98 --ebk] >>Art Bell and Richard Hoagland cut me off at 2:04am MST ON >>12-31-1998 when I asked Art to ask me questions from Richard >>since Richard was incoherent and would not ask me any more >>questions. <snip> >I heard the program sir -- I think that this is what occurs when >you open your mouth, insert your foot, and then attempt to echo >internationally. I think you got more civility than you deserve. I couldn't agree more. Any man who pretends to be an expert and then claims that either the F-117A stealth interdictor or the SR-71 have been used as "interceptors" deserves no air time at all - even if Hoagland and Bell are running the modern-day equivalent of the Banana Splits for conspiracy theorists. As far as I and many colleagues are concerned Stephens is another Ed Fouche - big on talk and totally lacking in remotely credible evidence. Tim Matthews.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp