UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1999 > Jan > Jan 2

Re: Carl and Richard

From: Roger Evans <moviestuff@cyberjunkie.com>
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 08:49:43 +0000
Fwd Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 11:34:49 -0500
Subject: Re: Carl and Richard


>From: Doug Paul <dougpaul@river.netrover.com>
>Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 16:21:38 -0500
>Fwd Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1999 08:08:07 -0500
>Subject: Carl and Richard

Previously, Doug asked:

>I've been reading this list for about 3 years now and have
>noticed a collective perspective that never fails to interest
>me.

<snip>

>My year-end question, therefore, is: why do most people on this
>list dismiss almost everything Richard Hoagland writes, does or
>says, while admiring (dare I say worship?)almost verything Carl
>Sagan wrote, did or said?

Happy New Year, Doug!

Three years? I don't know; I've only been with the list about
four months and I've heard enough dissing of Carl Sagan to last
me a life time. You might want to go back through the archives,
starting with the ill-fated "Failure of the Science of Obergian
Debunking" thread to get an earfull about Sagan. In addition,
you might check out any of the threads about SETI as well. Both
Hoagland and Sagan have their detractors, each for different
reasons. But "worship" of Sagan? I don't see it. Not on this
List.

Take care,

Roger Evans

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com