|
From: Gildas Bourdais <GBourdais@aol.com> Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 18:34:11 EST Fwd Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 22:22:48 -0500 Subject: Re: FOX Hoax Special - Reaction >From: moviestuff@cyberjunkie.com >Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 10:34:38 +0000 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net> >Subject: FOX Hoax Special - Reaction >>From: Gildas Bourdais <GBourdais@aol.com> >>Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 11:07:21 EST >>Fwd Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 00:47:19 -0500 >>Subject: Re: FOX Hoax Special - Reaction Just answering your conclusion on Ray Santilli-the-Hoaxer, who knew nothing about Roswell, and UFOs in general : >Do you think Santilli is going to act any differently? Playing >"dumb" is probably the easiest thing Santilli has to do in >association with this whole extravaganza. >He'll never admit anything when there's money to be made. Apparently, you have an answer to everything. However, I still fail to understand how a little music producer, who knew nothing about the Roswell case, and was not interested in UFOs in general, ponders one day : What about producing a UFO hoax ? Now suppose that, however crazy it seems to be, he launches into this risky project. If I were in that position, I would at least gather some information on the story, in order to avoid too obvious mistakes. But, no, he has not done that, apparently. The makes a body very different from the descriptions of Roswell witnesses (fat belly, muscular, six fingers...). And the story of the cameraman does not fit either. Let's stop here: Santilli as a hoaxer is just about as convincing as Laurel and Hardy. Something else happened. Something big. Sometime, the wind is going to blow and , as we say in French: "Ca va d=E9coiffer". Take care, Gildas Bourdais
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp