From: Gildas Bourdais <GBourdais@aol.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 18:34:11 EST
Fwd Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 22:22:48 -0500
Subject: Re: FOX Hoax Special - Reaction


>From: moviestuff@cyberjunkie.com
>Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 10:34:38 +0000
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: FOX Hoax Special - Reaction


>>From: Gildas Bourdais <GBourdais@aol.com>
>>Date: Fri, 8 Jan 1999 11:07:21 EST
>>Fwd Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 00:47:19 -0500
>>Subject: Re: FOX Hoax Special - Reaction

Just answering your conclusion on Ray Santilli-the-Hoaxer, who
knew  nothing about Roswell, and UFOs in general :

>Do you think Santilli is going to act any differently? Playing
>"dumb" is probably the easiest thing Santilli has to do in
>association with this whole extravaganza.

>He'll never admit anything when there's money to be made.

Apparently, you have an answer to everything.

However, I still fail to understand how a little music producer,
who knew nothing about the Roswell case, and was not interested
in UFOs in general, ponders one day : What about producing a UFO
hoax ? Now suppose that, however crazy it seems to be, he
launches into this risky project. If I were in that position, I
would at least gather some information on the story, in order to
avoid too obvious mistakes. But, no, he has not done that,
apparently. The makes a body very different from the
descriptions of Roswell witnesses (fat belly, muscular, six
fingers...). And the story of the cameraman does not fit either.

Let's stop here: Santilli as a hoaxer is just about as
convincing as Laurel and Hardy. Something else happened.
Something big. Sometime, the wind is going to blow and , as we
say in French: "Ca va d=E9coiffer".

Take care,

Gildas Bourdais