From: Tim Matthews <email@example.com> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 06:38:21 -0000 Fwd Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 14:38:39 -0500 Subject: Re: The Credibility of Edgar Fouche' >From: Roger Evans <firstname.lastname@example.org> >Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 09:30:17 +0000 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> >Subject: Re: The Credibility of Edgar Fouche' >>From: Serge Salvaille <firstname.lastname@example.org> >>Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 19:38:22 -0500 >>Fwd Date: Sat, 09 Jan 1999 23:11:30 -0500 >>Subject: Re: The Credibility of Edgar Fouche' >>>From: Tim Matthews <email@example.com> >>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <firstname.lastname@example.org> >>>Subject: Re: UFO UpDate: The Credibility of Edgar Fouche' >>>Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 23:10:30 -0000 >Previously, Tim had declared: >>>Not slander, just a request for some proof..... >>>Do you or your husband have a view on Senator Moynihans' recent >>>comments that scientific advances cannot be hidden for more than >>>a few years?? >Serge responded: >>I have asked you, on >>this List, a couple of times, a few pointed questions based >>"specifically" on this secret hidden technology paradox inherent >>to your research-claims: you never answered the damn questions. Do you know how many emails I get daily - at least 200! Re-ask the questions and I'll try to answer them! How does your response affect the credibility of Mr Fouche and "associates"? Not one bit. >>Surprised - well, not really, rather pissed off - when you take >>this rabbit out of the hat: >>>NO! Just to ask serious and detailed questions about his >>>"evidence", which by any standards can best be described as >>>hearsay. >I couldn't agree more, Serge. >I, too, have questioned Tim about his "I've got a secret in my >pocket that can prove all my claims" approach to debate. Several >times he said he was going to send me some technical info that >he didn't feel comfortable releasing on the list. Never got it. >When I brought this up on the list, he sent me an email claiming >his computer was down and he'd get back to me later, or >something as such. I'll let you guess the end to this vapor-ware >charade. This is just complete and unadultered drivel from somebody who should know better. Anyway, my book's out in a few weeks so you can buy that and whinge about it. Stick to the point, or more specifically the points under review..... >By the way, if you look in MY pocket, you'll find out who killed >JFK! >No...not that pocket. That's reserved for Roswell. >No...not that pocket, that's where I keep the secrets of >Stonehenge. >Hey, I need a bigger coat!<G> Incredible - must have been in Ufology for too long!
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp