UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1999 > Jan > Jan 17

Re: R.A.M.S. - A Parting Shot?

From: judithdale <judithdale@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 12:20:34 -0800
Fwd Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 15:33:28 -0500
Subject: Re: R.A.M.S. - A Parting Shot?

>Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 17:23:35 +0000
>From: Robert A. M. Stephens <sti3818@montana.com>
>To: UFO Updates Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>,
>Subject: R.A.M.S. - A Parting Shot?

>>From Joe Frimage

>>I, for one, believe this debate should occur. >>

I am adding my voice to Mr. Firmage's, I too believe this debate
should occur.

>>From Gersten to Firmage:

>And why is that, Joe?  Why do you think Richard should 'debate'
>an admitted and proven charlatan?  I would suggest you see Patch
>Adams instead.  Remember that old saying...'fool me once...shame
>on you; fool me twice...shame on me?' What do you think happens
>the third time?

Do we know, really, that Mr. Stephens is a fraud? I think not.
He certainly has brought information to the fore that no one
else has. Mr. Theroux has posted on his site, Borderlands,
information about the NORAD fence, as well as information
pertaining to the continued use of the SR-71 craft as a
strategic air asset. This information is real and true. So he
stepped on some toes. Big deal. There's much worse going on.

Considering that we as humans are likely facing beings with a
technology that far surpasses ours, and whose intent is
suspicious, at the very least, I say we need all of the info we
can amass. Let's not shoot good messengers, whose style may not
be liked.

I am of the belief, that just because these reported beings have
great technology, is no guarantee that they have their act any
more together than we do. Ignorance is dangerous and
disempowering. So I say, let Mr. Stephens have at it.

>Hi Peter  (from Fraud)

>Heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssssssssss back......el

>I believe I can answer your question to Mr. Firmage,  my dear
>Peter,  at least in part.

>The third time always results in a reimbursement of the second.
>Art Bell -Hoagland-CAUS & Co.  should have reason to look back
>across the gulf of events and look at the situation quite
>carefully,  then.

>Too,  it will be fitting that even a Fraud will be able to
>divulge more Fraud,  since it takes a thief to find a thief.
>You should be so wise.

>I'm  back.  We got 199 questions to answer.  They should be
>asked by someone at the very bottom of the social food chain.
>That,   I believe,  in this venue, at this current moment,  is

I am terribly curious to hear the questions and the response.
I've had many questions regarding Mr. Hoagland's information


Good idea. Let's.

Judith Dale

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com