UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1999 > Jan > Jan 18

Re: Military Retirees & Secrecy

From: moviestuff@cyberjunkie.com
Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 19:13:05 +0000
Fwd Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 10:42:39 -0500
Subject: Re: Military Retirees & Secrecy

>From: Dave Vetterick <veterick@ix.netcom.com>
>Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 18:53:01 -0600
>Fwd Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 14:28:45 -0500
>Subject: Re: Military Retirees & Secrecy

>>Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 17:50:20 +0000
>>From: Roger Evans <moviestuff@cyberjunkie.com>
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>Subject: Military Retirees & Secrecy

Previously, Dave offered:


>Roger, no offense, but suggesting the government and military is
>going to inflict illegal bodily harm over this and could get
>away with it, as you said they likely did over the Contra
>dealings, is far fetched and bordering on paranoia in my
>Intimidation is a tool, but to suggest in this day and time that
>the military could threaten anything other than putting a person
>in Ft. Leavenworth much less illegal bodily harm to a person's
>family, and get away with it just isn't realistic.


>If I were illegally threatened this way by the military, or any
>REAL government agency I'd be on CNN and MSNBC within the hour.

And just what, exactly, would you use to back up your claims,

I can assure you, you'd find it virtually impossible to get on
any local news station, much less a network, without some kind
of proof. Based on my access to the news media, I can tell you
that people make these claims you are talking about on a regular
basis and are turned away, just as you would be.

As I stated before, the problem isn't what the government does
that we know about and can prove; it's what we don't know about
and can't prove that is the problem. Now, on balance, it would
seem a reasonable question that if we don't know about these
things then how can I support my position? Well, as I said, my
father had film and tapes confiscated MANY times over the course
of his 45 years in television news. Unless my father and the
other field engineers he worked with are lying, then I'd say
this is more than "far fetched and bordering on paranoia".

It's very real and it happens all the time which is why the
stations are not going to cooperate unless someone has iron clad
proof. A sure fire way for a station to go out of business is to
butt heads with the government without anything to back them up.
Don't forget, a station must have an FCC license and the
government is under no obligation to renew it in a timely
manner, if at all, if they do not want to. Being off the air for
only a month or two can be irreversibly devastating.

I respect you own beliefs, Dave. But I think they are based on
your own strengths as an individual, and I mean that as a
compliment. I have no doubt from the way you present your
arguments that you, genuinely, do not fear the government.

But I think you should.

Besides, paranoia is simply a heightened state of awareness.<g>

Take care,

Roger Evans

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com