UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1999 > Jan > Jan 19

Re: Military Retirees & Secrecy

From: Dave Vetterick <veterick@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:17:10 -0600
Fwd Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 07:29:49 -0500
Subject: Re: Military Retirees & Secrecy

>Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 12:45:04 -0800
>From: judithdale <judithdale@earthlink.net>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: Military Retirees & Secrecy

>>Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 18:53:01 -0600
>>From: Dave Vetterick <veterick@ix.netcom.com>
>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>Subject: Re: Military Retirees & Secrecy

>>>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993@aol.com>
>>>Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 09:13:13 EST
>>>To: updates@globalserve.net
>>>Subject: Re: Military Retirees & Secrecy

>>>Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 17:50:20 +0000
>>>From: Roger Evans <moviestuff@cyberjunkie.com>
>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>>Subject: Military Retirees & Secrecy

>>>>Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:46:28 -0600
>>>>From: Dave Vetterick <veterick@ix.netcom.com>
>>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>>>Subject: Re: Military Retirees & Secrecy

>>>>>Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 23:32:40 -0800
>>>>>From: Judith Dale <judithdale@earthlink.net>
>>>>>To: UFO UpDates-Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>>>>>Subject: Military Retirees & Secrecy

>>Perhaps I should have written my reply differently. I apologize.
>>However, the snip to Judith's message coming where it did has
>>caused some confusion which I'll attempt to clarify while at the
>>same time responding to Kevin and Roger's posts also noted

>Yes, I've noticed the confusion. Actually, its been interesting
>to watch information get skewed simply because its taken out of


>>My question was and still is...What is the basis for the fear
>>that if he talked it would put him, AND HIS IMMEDIATE FAMILY, in
>>"terrible danger", and "it is not SAFE for him to speak".

>>This implies bodily harm would come about if he spoke about 30
>>year old UFO related military secrets.


>>Judith said this gentleman now "vehemently hates the military".
>>So the obvious conclusion she makes herself is that its not the
>>oath keeping him silent, but the fear of bodily harm.

>>What was the nature of the threat, and who made it?

>Ofcourse, we don't know the nature of the threat, or who made
>it. The sense of family members is not so much that the danger
>is from "bodily harm" by agents of the military, as it is some
>bigger threat.


>FYI, I don't feel that my integrity has been challenged. Quite
>frankly, I'm clueless about the details of the threat, because
>Bill isn't telling us anymore than he has already. I just know
>that he was a Lt. Colonel in Air force Intelligence, responsible
>for a good deal of the Pacific Northwest.

>The threat may not have been one of "bodily harm". For all we
>know, the danger may be in some threat to the human
>socio/cultural/political paradigm.

>I don't think it serves any of us  to make assumptions about
>what the threats involve.

I suggested physical harm. You suggest a threat to humanity.

All I've asked is for someone to explain what the threat is.
This shouldn't violate any oath.

I'm sure you realize this claim of some dire consequences if I
talk bit has been made ad nauseam. Yet I've never seen ANYONE
say what the threat is.

If the threat is real and defined there are ways to deal with it
and eliminate it if its unjust and illegal.

I submit your guy likely doesn't know anything any more
devastating than what Col Corso claimed to know and published in
his book. Yet humanity survives.

No sarcasm intended, perhaps if he read Corso's book he feel
better about talking. I just hate to see potential valuable
information go to the grave.

Dave Vetterick

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com