From: "Ted Viens" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 19:52:07 -0600 Fwd Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 08:32:01 -0500 Subject: Re: Kenneth Arnold - Question >Date: Mon, 18 Jan 1999 12:13:52 -0500 >From: Gary <email@example.com> >To: UFO UpDate <firstname.lastname@example.org> >Subject: Re: Kenneth Arnold - Question >>Subject: UFO UpDate: Re: Kenneth Arnold - Question >>Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 19:26:00 -0500 >>From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> >>To: "UFO UpDates Subscribers":; >>From: Roger Evans <firstname.lastname@example.org> >>Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 18:09:13 +0000 >>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <email@example.com> >>Subject: Re: Kenneth Arnold - Question ><snip> >>And here are my logical, well formulated responses to the above: >>1) I think you are full of crap. >>2) I think the above proves you are full of crap. >>3) I will continue to consider you full of crap as long as you >>don't practice what you preach regarding "verification" of >>facts. >>4) Did I mention I think you are full of crap? >Whenever people can't follow an argument, or can't understand an >argument, their IQ begins to drop. Within days of their first >lapse noticeable declines in intelligence can be noted. In the >case of Mr. Evans, the drop has been most precipitous. A few >more of my messages will have reduced him to absolute jabbering. >It's a sad thing to watch. Such clever obfuscation, misdirection and self-praise, Gary. Still, you are ignoring one powerful possibility. We all understand your arguments perfectly clearly and Roger's intelligence is neither weak nor dropping. Bye... Ted..
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp