UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1999 > Jan > Jan 21

Re: Guilt By Association?

From: Roger Evans <moviestuff@cyberjunkie.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:20:40 +0000
Fwd Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 10:43:04 -0500
Subject: Re: Guilt By Association?

>From: Sean Jones <seanj@tedric.demon.co.uk>
>Date: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 20:13:58 +0000
>Fwd Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 02:41:39 -0500
>Subject: Guilt By Association?

Previously, Sean had written:

>As far as I know, ( I will stand corrected if someone can show
>me the evidence) the actual Alien Autopsy film has stood up to
>all the scrutiny but due to the extremely dubious way it was
>made public was immediately frowned upon by many big names in
>Ufology (capital U?). So straight away the smoking gun was cast
>into shadow.

Hi Sean,

To my knowledge, there is no "smoking gun" in regard to the AA
film. Why? Because the only smoking gun would be the original AA
film, itself. Santilli flat refuses to release this for
examination by Bob Shell and other qualified professionals that
could bolster Santilli's claim. This makes no sense and accounts
for "the extremely dubious way it was made public". Obviously,
this information SHOULD be taken into account when deciding the
validity of the AA footage and Santilli's claims, since Santilli
offers nothing else to judge him by.

And let's be clear about this:

This isn't a case like the mysterious Dr Reed where the 'alien
body' was stolen from his home. This isn't the flying saucer
that got away before it could be photographed. This isn't a case
of abduction where you only have the victim's faint memories to
build a story.

Santilli has the actual film in his possession, so there's no

Regarding the footage itself; I think it's a joke. I've said so
in many postings on this list and have outlined exactly why I
believe it to be fake. Are my opinions "proof"? No, they're not.
On the other hand, I'm not required to provide proof, Santilli
is. The fact that he won't even take steps within his power to
help himself is, in fact, "evidence" that chips away at the
"scrutiny" you mention above.

Finally, Sean asked:

>I wonder is it time to take a vote people? All those who believe
>the AA genuine hold your hands up, OK now all you who think its
>fake hold your hands up.

I do not believe the AA footage is fake simply because the tent
footage is known to be fake. The AA footage should be considered
fake until Santilli offers the proof that only he has in his

Roger Evans

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com