UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1999 > Jan > Jan 24

Re: Santilli Knew 'Tent Footage' Was a Fraud?

From: Steven W. Kaeser <steve@konsulting.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 07:25:51 -0500
Fwd Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 09:39:42 -0500
Subject: Re: Santilli Knew 'Tent Footage' Was a Fraud?


>Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 22:33:41 -0600 (CST)
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>From: Dennis Stacy<dstacy@texas.net>
>Subject: Re: Santilli Knew 'Tent Footage' Was a Fraud?

>>Hi James,

>>As Bob Shell pointed out in an earlier post, 16mm B&W motion
>>picture film from 1947 would have to be processed totally
>>different since it would require different chemicals at a lower
>>temperature. Bob correctly pointed out that the emulsion of the
>>old film would come right off using contemporary processing.

>>If the info about Santilli processing the film is true, then it
>>should be fairly easy to find the lab that did the work.

><snip>

>Wasn't the film already processed, ie, developed, when Santilli
>acquired it? Has it ever been claimed that Santilli received
>unprocessed/undeveloped film?

>Just curious about my bandwidth,


Dennis-

Your bandwidth is fine.

Santilli indicated that the "cameraman" had to process a number
of reels of film that required special processing, which I
assume means a varying degree of 'push' processing for those
rolls that needed it.  These rolls he allegedly had to be
processed by hand, which is why they were still in his
possession and not sent to Washington with the rest.

I believe that Santilli also said the "film" was very fragile
and had to be transfered to video a frame at a time, which may
be the "processing" that he has referred to in some statements.

Steve


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com