UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1999 > Jan > Jan 26

Re: Santilli's Film Scraps

From: Steven Kaeser <steve@konsulting.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 09:49:30 -0500
Fwd Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:23:17 -0500
Subject: Re: Santilli's Film Scraps

>Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 13:09:43 +0000
>Subject: Re: Santilli's Film Scraps
>From: Bob Shell <bob@bobshell.com>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>


>Actually, those film scraps came from Philip Mantle, via Reg,
>and are from the same strip as the samples I have.  They are
>copy film, not camera original, and therefore meaningless.

>All they can tell is what we already know, the copy film is pre-
>1955 in origin.


As I recall, the producer of the Channel 4 production in Great
Britain in 1995 was sent more "samples" of the alleged film than
anyone else.  I have written to him, but got no response, and
have no idea what kind of testing (if any) that he might have
pursued.  Do you know how much film he had been sent, and
whether or not he has pursued that angle at all.

You also commented in another post that Hesemman gave Ray the
undeveloped film that he'd been given in Roswell, and that Ray
allegedly had it developed.  While it would be possible to run
the film through the developing process, taking care to mix the
chemicals properly for the type of film involved, what would
have prevent cosmic radiation from fogging the film over the
years.  If that film was stored away in someone's home, it
wouldn't have been protected from such radiation, and it would
(according to some of your earlier statements) become so fogged
that it would be useless.

Any thoughts?


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com