UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1999 > Jan > Jan 30

Re: Santilli Knew 'Tent Footage' Was a Fraud?

From: Ralf Zeigermann <kag15@dial.pipex.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 21:28:28 +0100
Fwd Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 17:00:25 -0500
Subject: Re: Santilli Knew 'Tent Footage' Was a Fraud?

>From: Roger Evans <moviestuff@cyberjunkie.com>
>Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:14:17 +0000
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
>Subject: Re: Santilli Knew 'Tent Footage' Was a Fraud?

>>From: Bob Shell <bob@bobshell.com>
>>Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 07:58:48 +0000
>>Fwd Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:28:25 -0500
>>Subject: Re: Santilli Knew 'Tent Footage' Was a Fraud?

>If the cameraman did quickly make a secret copy for himself, it
>probably was a contact print and not an optical print.
>Therefore, the emmulsion on the print that Santilli bought (and
>gave you pieces of) would be on the opposite side than if it
>were original film from either a field camera or optical
>printer. This is assuming, of course, that Santilli is truthful
>that what he gave you is directly from what the cameraman sold

Hi all,

This is all getting a bit funny now. I can imagine the
'cameraman' developing the film in a tent, but quite honestly I
simply can't imagine him making a duplicate in a tent(!). As far
as I know you need some more bits and pieces of equipment for
dupes than just a tank...

So if we are talking about a 16mm duplicate here, who made it?



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com