From: John Rimmer <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 21:55:28 +0000 Fwd Date: Sat, 30 Jan 1999 17:19:26 -0500 Subject: Re: Abduction - The Issue Of Reality >From: Greg Sandow <email@example.com> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <firstname.lastname@example.org> >Subject: Re: 1999 UFO Alien Abduction Conference Announced >Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 10:43:26 -0500 <snip> >But typically abduction skeptics don't even mention the full >range of possible abduction evidence -- for instance, the claim >made by some abduction investigators that abductees corroborate >even tiny unpublished details in each others' reports. Note >again: I'm not insisting that this claim is correct, or that it >means abductions are real. More research needs to be done. I >_am_ saying that abduction skeptics rarely (if ever) mention it. The problem with this is that these researchers refuse to give us the details of the tiny unpublished details, claiming (with some logic) that if they did so it would 'contaminate' future reports. Consequently we have to take this all on trust. -- John Rimmer www.magonia.demon.co.uk Abandon hope all ye who press "enter" here.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp