From: Gildas Bourdais <GBourdais@aol.com> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 12:20:38 EDT Fwd Date: Fri, 08 Oct 1999 04:04:09 -0400 Subject: Re: RPIT - A Reminder >Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 16:23:11 +0100 >From: Neil Morris <Neil@adm1.ph.man.ac.uk> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <firstname.lastname@example.org> >Subject: Re: RPIT - A Reminder >>From: Gildas Bourdais <GBourdais@aol.com> >>Date: Mon, 4 Oct 1999 17:09:51 EDT >>Subject: Re: RPIT - A Reminder >>To: email@example.com >Dear Gildas, and List. <snip> >The attached image is taken from MarcelRight _but_ this same >piece of debris _is_ in the RameyDubose image though it has been >moved around somewhat. Dear Neil, I have some admiration for your tenacity in your analysis of the photographs. I have just looked at the attached file and I must admit that the piece you analyse is rather peculiar. Did other Roswell researchers give their opinion about it ? Y would like to have those of Kevin Randle, Stan Friedman, David Rudiak, who are on this list, and also Karl Pflock, I suppose? And why not the opinion of Dennis Stacy, Jerome Clark and others? Or perhaps they have answered already on this List and I am not aware of that ? I would also like very much like to have answers to my questions regarding Jaime Shandera. I am perplexed (again) at the absence of answer to my question. Am I to understand that Shandera does not interest anyone anymore ? I also have a question to Dennis Stacy, in answer to his message of 4 october. You mentioned the "last interview" of Jesse Marcel Sr. Which one is it? I know of several interviews, in which he described the pieces: 22 Feb 1978 with Stan Friedman (tel) 7 April 1978 with Len Stringfield and Steve Tom (see Status report II, Case A-10, Jan 1980) February, May and December 1979, with Moore and Friedman (mentioned in the book of Bill Moore, 1980) 8 December 1979 with Bob Pratt reproduced entirely by Karl Pflockin "Roswell in Perspective" (FUFOR, 1994) And now we discover the Linda Corley interview of 5 May 1981. Are you refering to this one or another one ? Anyway, if we refer to the longest interview on record, the one of Bob Pratt as published by Karl Pflock and the FUFOR in 1994, Marcel describes much more varied material than you quote in your post ! Besides, as you certainly remember, there are other witnesses. Do we need to give the list ? Regarding the Linda Corley interview, I would like to know wher and when she spoke about it. I it find significant that, a week later, Marcel called her to deny everything, apparently very frightened: this happened not very long after the book of Moore (1980), and the report of Stringfield (Jan 80), where he appeared with his name. Any comment on this, Mr Stacy ? Gildas Bourdais ----------------------- >DuBose and Marcel stated clearly that the balloon story was a >cover up. I suspect the "balloon" story was not original to Ramey or Dubose, recovered text from the Ramey Message appears to say on line 7: ... THRY EVEN PUT FOR AF WEATATN BALLOONS RADAR WERE ... (theory) (weather station) >DuBose says that he never saw the real debris.> Ex CIC Capt Sheradon Cavitt says all that was found on the Foster Ranch was a single Meteo Balloon and a single reflector and he and Marcel picked it up, and returned to RAAF, he also said the "sticks" they collected were made of bamboo!, end of story... He _should_ know, he was there with Maj Marcel, so why don't we believe _his_ _sworn_ testimony, close the book and get on with lives?. <section on Jaime Shandera snipped> Bond might comment on this, he was interviewed by him.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp