UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 1999 > Oct > Oct 20

Re: Get Real

From: Amy Hebert <yelorose@swbell.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 01:22:50 -0500
Fwd Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 17:08:30 -0400
Subject: Re: Get Real


 >From: Sharon Kardol <sharon@hotmix.com.au>
 >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <updates@globalserve.net>
 >Subject: Re: Get Real
 >Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:59:13 +0800

 >Thanks for admitting that Amy. But I have yet to scoff at
 >anything. Since when is talking about a case considered
 >scoffing? If people don't ask questions and simply accept the
 >facts blindly, we'll never get to the truth about anything.

Yes, asking questions is important.  What I have noted is that
no one has asked the questions that a skilled researcher would
ask.  There are many pieces of information - in this case and
the photographs as presented on my web site - that no one has
even mentioned.  Those who know what they are looking at would
be asking the necessary questions by now.

A good researcher would take note of these aspects not to debunk
or ridicule but simply to inquire and file in their data base
for comparisons with other cases.  There is no way to prove a
case real or false simply by reading the details on a web site
and viewing scanned versions of photographs.

 >What I did say however, was the neighbour was called >in
specifically to take photos of this encounter and the glass
 >door was left closed.

Whoa.  That is not what happened.  The neighbor was not called
in to specifically take photos.  The neighbor was called to come
help - if she could - since by that time the family thought
maybe the beings resembled "aliens" more than "demons" and the
only person they knew who studied phenomena was their neighbor.
The neighbor, "Jill", brought her camera as an after thought in
case she might catch something on film - as she had been trying
to do in her own encounters.

The door was _not_ "left closed" deliberately, "Jill" arrived
and nervously started snapping pictures as soon as she arrived
because "Cathy" was pointing to the back yard and "Jill" just
started snapping pictures.  A few minutes later, "Jill" and
"Cathy's" sister gained enough courage to go into the back yard
together to see if they could see anything in the dark. "Jill"
also snapped pictures while in the back yard and odd images did
show up such as two bright red lights about a foot above the
ground as well as other images that have yet to be analyzed and
studied.  Though neither "Jill" nor "Cathy's" sister saw
anything while in the yard, "Cathy" - who remained in the house
- could see a being standing by the swing set that would move
away every time "Jill" and the sister approached it.

Now, allowing the circumstances described above and the
information in the article to be possible - for just a moment -
think of the implications contained in the information.  There
are several bits of information that may have come together to
create a unique situation in which these images became visible
in the photographs.  As I said before, there are more details to
this case yet to be presented.  But since no one seems
interested enough to ask pertinent questions or is too busy
criticizing the state of the sliding glass door, I will share
the rest at a later date through another median.

There is a wealth of information in this case if one stops to
analyze the data rather than spending more time debating why the
witnesses did or did not open the sliding glass door.  These
were real people experiencing real fear in the face of unknowns
they could not explain.  I met and talked with the witnesses -
in person - so I remember the terror in their voices and the
shock they experienced and continue to experience.

Until I investigated this case, I wasn't sure if abductions were
really happening and I certainly _did not_ believe the stories
about "reptilian" beings.  In fact, I don't think I will ever
totally accept the idea of "reptilian" beings abducting people
until I see one in conscious, waking awareness up close and in
person (not something I really care to do).  For now, it's just
too hard for me to stretch my paradigms that far.  But I know
something happened to those witnesses on the nights in question
and whatever it was, it really happened.

Over the years since learning of this case, I have spent many
hours debating in my own mind whether it was real or not.  There
were events that occurred while I was investigating the case
that are extremely hard for me to accept even though I
experienced them myself.  I don't know how to explain what it
feels like to be empirically oriented and come face-to-face with
phenomena that defies explanation.  I am basically the type who
believes if you can't put something under a microscope and
measure it, then it does not exist.  Yet I cannot deny the
phenomena I and others have personally witnessed.

I know how hard it is for people to accept the phenomena that
surrounds us especially if you don't see it or experience it in
person.  How do you explain a reality we have been programmed to
deny since the early '50's? How do you remain a "healthy
skeptic" yet open minded enough to consider all possibilities?
It's a difficult balance.

Amy

Home Page: "http://TheVanguard.tripod.com"





[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com