From: Eed Gehrman <email@example.com> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2001 14:26:47 -0800 Fwd Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 07:53:52 -0500 Subject: Re: Schulgen & Balsa Wood - Gehrman >From: Karl Pflock <Ktperehwon@aol.com> >Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2001 11:25:45 EST >Subject: Re: Schulgen & Balsa Wood >To: firstname.lastname@example.org >>Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 22:13:10 -0800 (PST) >>From: Mac Tonnies <email@example.com> >>Subject: Schulgen & Balsa Wood >>To: UfoUpdates <firstname.lastname@example.org> >>But _balsa_wood_? >>I can't help but feel there is a link with Roswell here. >Mac, read footnote 14 to chapter 15, f'pete's sake! Karl, I've read footnote 14 and have a hard time understanding your reasoning. I believe your point is the following: Metalite and Fabrilite were being used experimentally by the US aircraft industry, therefore this was what Schulgen was inferring and thinking about when he requested information about "sandwich construction & balsa wood". What is your evidence that this is what he was referring to? Your footnote needs more elaboration to be convincing. And why is this information just a footnote if it's so important? Also I have serious doubts about the authenticity of the Schulgen memorandum that you've determined genuine. Do you realize that the introduction to the memorandum and the enclosure were typed on two different typewriters? I agree with Mac. Who's to really say which document is authentic; maybe neither one for that matter. Could you reproduce the documents for the List? They are very important! Ed P.S. I also think folks should buy 'Roswell: Inconvenient Facts And The Will To Believe' and read it carefully. You certainly have done some wonderful research.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp