UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2003 > Dec > Dec 2

Scabrous Shadows And The Blue Hare

From: Alfred Lehmberg <Lehmberg@snowhill.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:27:51 _0600
Fwd Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 09:33:54 -0500
Subject: Scabrous Shadows And The Blue Hare


Scabrous Shadows And The Blue Hare... Scurrilous Psycho_social
Shenanigans!

By Alfred Lehmberg

I've just finished the highly controversial Max Burns article
"The Usual Suspects" (in the latest "Notes From The Borderland"
edited by Dr. Larry O'Hara), and, based very inconclusively on
personal interactions with some of the principals, I can make a
confident prediction on where I'd come down at some quickly
approaching future denouement. Additionally, and as hyperbolic
as the reader may believe this to be, I am energized to new
levels of ufological rage with regard to the way things appear
and as they have been verified by the principals in this affair!
Verily, I'm fit to be tied, reader, and more to the point, I
hope to engage _you_ in this rage, encourage _your_ indignation,
precipitate _your_ resentment, and fan the very flames of _your_
well provoked wrath!

It appears we have been done _blithe_ disservice, fellow
ufological travelers! We're led down smug and defeatist paths
leading to confusion, indifference, ignoble bias, programmed
ignorance, and likely... personal loss. Wheels _were_ wastefully
spun in this disservice; personal liberties may have been lost
in this disservice; civil rights may have been suspended in this
disservice; ufology may have been set back 20 years with this
disservice! Egregious crimes against the rising and advancing of
a human spirit may have been perpetrated, and it may be that
what has been exposed is a likely tip of the proverbial iceberg!

...Any reader considering the preceding mere hyperbole can just
go straight to hell; there was no arguing with _you_ anyway!

For the rest... there has evolved, disastrously, a way of doing
ufological business, for some, that must be nipped in the seed_
 pod! The Neo_psychosocials (exposed by Jerry Clark) have at
last demonstrated that they have gone too far and _may_ have
recently admitted to a decades long program (a pathology,
really) of _ deliberate_ obfuscation, evidence corruption,
witness manipulation (if not, intimidation!), and criminal
confabulation... extending god_knows where and concealing god_
 knows_what!

What have they done?

Significant and well known persons (names we know!) are
implicated in a seemingly well supported charge of conspiracy to
deceive and defraud... as a result of hoaxes fabricated, by
them, in an effort to confound _legitimate_ researchers and
invalidate real research! The admitted _fact_ of it is defended,
too late, by the principals... as a practical exercise in the
"interests of science", and as an "honorable" devise to keep our
ufology (_already_ rife with debilitating hoaxes) honest! That
is too little, too late, and too conveniently contrived, good
reader. Moreover, it doesn't wash!

It's like a person caught pissing in your swimming pool
protesting it needed to be done to lower the water's pH! It's
like a thief selling a phony insurance policy and laughing at
your inability to get a pay_out! It's like an obvious sinner
protesting his ultimate saintliness and then dashing off with
his best friend's wife! I would hope that all these persons
implicated in this scurrilous deception (psycho_socials and
assorted CSICOPians) step out of the shadows (Burns has
intimated in his article) and disclose what they know about this
programmed hoaxing in an effort to filter the befouled
ufological waters! I won't hold my breath!

These misguided, erroneous, and unethical neo_psychosocials have
needlessly, arrogantly, and as a result of self_involved conceit
and clear disrespect for _you_, good reader, completely
overstepped their ethical bounds... and in the name of science,
no less! Pause to guffaw!

I cannot _conceiv_ of the sneering arrogance from Mr. Andy
Roberts or his false bravado with regard to his PRIDE in the
perpetration of a series of energy wasting hoaxes (...for _how_
 many years now?)! How blatantly ignorant! How tragically
unenlightened!  How unconscionably destructive! Moreover, who
died and elected him our ufological god of manipulated
realities? More still, from what fetid depths of bald_faced
self_involvement could this monstrous conceit even originate?
Just who does he think he is, what personal credibility does he
imagine is _not_ destroyed, and why does he think we need
believe a single thing a psycho_social ufologist has to say...
ever again?

Don't these people realize that it is _their_ behavior that is
the most lamentable, and that much more is said about _them_ in
cases such as this... than is said with regard to anything or
anyone they'd criticize! Can they _not_ understand how their
performance is no different than going to the police with a well
constructed report for a fictional crime being committed, and
then chastise and ridicule the _police_ for believing this
fabrication? Where is the difference? What service is performed
but the marginalization of the _righteous_ and the
minimalization of the _truth_? Why would we not be completely
opposed to _any_ confabulation of the truth, for _any_ reason?
Why would we remotely tolerate this heedless and _enraging_
 transgression? Will you tolerate it?

Was a *ringer* (the "Blue Hare" in the title of this piece) sent
into a Max Burns lecture to record false testimony planted as a
result of Mr. Roberts ongoing and proudly _admitted_
neo-psychosocial program of shameful duplicity and insane hoaxes?
How is this _not_ evidence of the psycho_socials unethically
trying to torpedo Max Burns' investigation into Sheffield?
Verily, were these individuals to play that dishonorable game
with me they could compensate me in civil court for infringing
on my civil rights!

Does the reader remember when Dr. John Mack had a seminar of
abductees some years ago and used much of the testimony of the
individuals at the seminar in his research later on? When he
published his findings, subsequently, the robed and hooded
CSICOPians gleefully trotted out the female *ringer* that they
had intelligently prepared and then scurrilously planted in Dr.
Mack's innocent bosom... to demonstrate the invalidity of his _
entire_ research! Does anyone else see a parallel here? Really,
good reader! How does an artful and prepared _liar_ invalidate a
research, at all, but by its innocent and guileless inclusion in
that research? A color test for sugar _presumes_ that there won't
be any _salt_ used as a control in the test, reader! Truly, this
duplicity _shall_ not be taken as a comment on Dr. Mack's
competence as a scientist, more than be taken as an _indictment_
 on the acts of what can only be called his less than honorable,
uptight, and reactionary _persecutors_!

Is Max Burns being persecuted in a similar fashion? This writer
remembers the plight of John Ford and wonders! Are the busy imps
of *Psycho-socia* passionately engaged in poisoning his
ufological wells, refusing his challenges to debate on the
record, denying him his opportunity to be heard, assassinating
his character, or sabotaging his research and investigation?
Burns makes a good, non-paranoid, case that they are! He has
citation, he names names, and significant persons have come out
in his defense (not the least of which are his detractors... by
their own admissions!). His artless detractors, on the other
hand, use character smears, duplicitous spins (one involving
_this_ writer!), and strength of numbers to invalidate, harass,
minimalize, and marginalize him!

Seriously, reader! When Max Burns says he wrote his article to
make a report demonstrating how some of our number are
prosecuting their ufological business, he wasn't just whistling
Dixie! Something is _indeed_ rotten in psycho_social Denmark,
it's stinking to high heaven, and it is to the detriment of all
of us if it be allowed to continue. This _admitted_
neo-psychosocial program of hidden duplicity, false witness, and
convenient ethics is counterproductive, cross-purposed, and
basely unintelligent. Verily, they are a ufological al-Qaida in
our midst and must be rooted out by flower, seed and stem! Where
is your rage, good reader? You've been pla yed for a ufological
fool! Get angry! You're entitled!

I highly recommend that you read this article, which is a
ponderous and detailed read, but an indicator that ufology is
one _hell_ of a lot more muddled than it needs to be, suffers
needless and deliberately contrived hurdles in its hamstrung
execution, and is manipulated or intimidated by self_styled
agents of _malicious_ misdirection! These practitioners of easy
duplicity should be run out of town on a ufological rail!
They've betrayed the trust and _must_ be censured! Verily, they
perform no service but a clear disturbance of the peace.
Moreover, they are the antithesis of science. They are dirt on
our ufological shoes. They must be... stopped!

Look around reader! Psycho-social Ufology is not as it appears!
Buyer... beware!



Lehmberg@snowhill.com



EXPLORE "AlienViewGroup" at its HostPros URL.
http://www.alienview.net


JOHN FORD RESTORATION FUND __ John will be released eventually.
He'll need a tax free cash stake to get on his feet. Let's put
one together for him; the bigger it is __ the more attention
he gets. It could have been you. E_mail for detail.
$350.00 pledged __ $200.00 collected!

"I cleave the heavens, and soar to the infinite. What others see
from afar, I leave far behind me." -- Giordano Bruno, scourged by
the scabrously specious psycho-socials.