UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2003 > Dec > Dec 11

Re: sTARBABY & A New CSICOP Coverup? - Gehrman

From: Ed Gehrman <egehrman@psln.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:19:48 -0800
Fwd Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 12:50:39 -0500
Subject: Re: sTARBABY & A New CSICOP Coverup? - Gehrman

>From: David Rudiak <DRudiak@earthlink.net>
>To: <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
>Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 16:27:17 -0800
>Subject: Re: sTARBABY & A New CSICOP Coverup?

>>From: William Scott Scherk <wss@uniserve.com>
>>To: <ufoupdates@virtuallystrange.net>
>>Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 18:28:54 -0800
>>Subject: Re: sTARBABY & A New CSICOP Coverup?


>The USAF came out with their infamous "Case
>Closed" time-traveling crash dummy explanation for alien bodies,
>and Col. Philip Corso also came out with his equally infamous
>"Day After Roswell", supposedly "pro-Roswell," but possibly a
>case of stealth debunkery because it was so full of obviously
>inaccurate BS and exaggerated claims.


Source: http://www.caus.org/membercomments/mc062900.shtml

Blunders do not make a hoaxer or a liar. Col. Corso would have
to be both if he didn't seed alien technology into US business,
as he says he did. The *Day After Roswell* is about that fact
and is not intended as a history of the cold war and shouldn't
be read in that way. It comes down to whether you believe he was
trying to tell the truth, not whether he produced a mistake free
document. Col. Corso's testimony is primary source material and
should be treated as such, just as we use diaries and old
letters to understand the dynamics of the Civil War. There's
absolutely no reason to believe that Col. Corso is a liar.

He may have make numerous mistakes, but his testimony concerning
the seeding of alien technology is a lie or it's the truth. It
is certainly not a "mistake". Was he telling the truth about
that or wasn't he? If he wasn't, then he's a liar and a fake.
It's that issue that we all need to wrestle with. It's not
enough to insist that he made some mistakes, therefore he
shouldn't be believed. The mistakes have become red herrings
pulled across our path to distract us from the important
information Col.Corso has bravely given us.

I have no proof that Col. Corso is telling the truth other than
my knowledge that he was an honorable and truthful person, a
super patriot and well respected by his peers.

(He also passed a three hour Voice Stress Analysis taken from a
taped interview on Art bell)

He has no history of being deceitful or of perpetrating hoaxes.
He held responsible positions in the service of our country and
was a good friend and advisor to some of the most important and
powerful people in the country from 1945 on to the present.

By all accounts he was fair, scrupulously honest and an all
around good Joe.

When he states that our government has seeded alien technology
into the US business community and that he should know because
he was the person who accomplished the task, I believe him. He
had no reason to lie and there is no evidence that he has done
so in the past.