UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2005 > May > May 4

Re: Debating Good Vs. Evil Aliens - Smith

From: James Smith <zeus001002.nul>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 15:47:22 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
Fwd Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 08:17:57 -0400
Subject: Re: Debating Good Vs. Evil Aliens - Smith


>From: Mike Jamieson <mike.jamieson.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 11:59:58 -0700
>Subject: Debating Good Vs. Evil Aliens

Good and evil depends on perspective in this matter. Aliens may
think it good to completely control humans, harvest their organs
or genes, whatever. They may think humans evil since they
destroy their world and perform alien autopsies and such.

So the question is are the aliens good to humans from
a human perspective or evil. (I guess then you must define
what humans think is good and evil too since many
dictators think they are doing their citizens good by
controlling them).

>I noticed that Stephen Bassett suggests we continue to debate
>the moral character, etc. of alleged aliens present on earth
>(and reportedly interacting with us in various ways).

>Is their a reliable, and sufficient, body of data to really
>carry on a useful debate?

Using UFO databases and UFO folklore, we should have enough data
(its hard to separate each!).

We can assume that the body of data we currently have is enough
to form an initial assessment with probabilities associated for
each conclusion.

It would be too late if we waited until we got much better
quality data (cities being blown up by aliens).

Better to be on the side of conservativeness rather than
blissful and welcoming.

Abductions and all their problems don't even have to be
considered. Just look at all the cases of close calls with
aircraft, UFOs terrorizing people by following them, stopping
cars, irradiating people, being misinterpreted as non-alien
military attacks (yes, aliens SHOULD be smart enough to realize
that COULD happen), blatantly violating human laws of
airspace/property.

Really, we need more data, if any, of good things they do for
humans.

>One of the things that irritated the hell out of me, during the
>dying days of Operation Right To Know (I was a co-founder), was
>the amount of space taken up in our Right To Know Forum (in the
>last few issues) over this very debate. My irritation probably
>was based on the feeling that I simply didn't know enough (or, I
>didn't assume that what others thought that they "knew" was
>actually so). Therefore, spending energy on that question seemed
>a bit premature... and a waste of time.

Theoretically, we can discuss the issue. Its just that, like with
abortion, there are two sides and they don't budge.




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com