From: James Smith <zeus001002.nul> Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 10:55:57 -0400 (GMT-04:00) Fwd Date: Thu, 05 May 2005 13:27:22 -0400 Subject: Re: The Engineered Moon - Smith >From: Lan Fleming <lfleming6.nul> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 08:19:07 -0500 >Subject: Re: The Engineered Moon >>From: James Smith <zeus001002.nul> >>To: ufoupdates.nul >>Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 13:40:56 -0400 (GMT-04:00) >>Subject: Re: The Engineered Moon >>Yes, I know and stated this. You need to ask him why he omitted >>the Apollo 12 data in the 1991 paper. I doubt it was due to peer >>pressure. There is likely a good rationale. >Freeman considered the readings from the Apollo 12 site to be >important enough to mention in the abstract of the original >paper. Peer pressure or not, there is no good excuse for simply >dropping something without explanation that was important enough >to be included in the abstract and then referred to throughout >the paper. I sent him an email and he said that he has to review the paper because it happened so long ago. I will let you know what he says.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp