UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2005 > May > May 10

Re: Debating Good Vs. Evil Aliens - Jamieson

From: Mike Jamieson <mike.jamieson.nul>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 11:28:14 -0700
Fwd Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 08:45:51 -0400
Subject: Re: Debating Good Vs. Evil Aliens - Jamieson

>From: Amy Hebert <ahebert.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 03:39:21 -0500
>Subject: Re: Debating Good Vs. Evil Aliens

>>From: James Smith <zeus001002.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 15:47:22 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
>>Subject: Re: Debating Good Vs. Evil Aliens

>>>From: Mike Jamieson <mike.jamieson.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 11:59:58 -0700
>>>Subject: Debating Good Vs. Evil Aliens

>>Good and evil depends on perspective in this matter. Aliens may
>>think it good to completely control humans, harvest their organs
>>or genes, whatever. They may think humans evil since they
>>destroy their world and perform alien autopsies and such.


>If I may add my two cents worth...

>I spent many years engaged in reflection and discussion about
>this topic. Below is one of the articles I wrote, years ago, to
>express my views:

>Why Goes There


>No matter how many theories we may conjure about which ones are
>the "good aliens" and which ones are "bad", the bottom line is
>we _do_not_ know. It is wiser, therefore, to proceed with
>extreme caution in _all_ encounters and negotiations with beings
>of unknown origins and intentions. We have much more to lose by
>accepting all we are told because we 'want' to believe than by
>remaining curious yet cautious.


>I wrote another article of a similar nature which can still be
>found at:


Great discussion (and points), James and Amy.

I think the best data (so far as I can tell) comes out of
caseloads developed by Hopkins and Jacobs. Looks like there's a
good investigative effort in Australia, associated with a Bill
Chalker, that seems to provide good clues also.

And, the data doesn't suggest an open and transparent approach
or interaction.

So, Amy's right. Caution is important for efforts designed to
actually reach out for contact with the intelligences that are
"out there" (or, seem to be out there, anyway).

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com