From: James Smith <zeus001002.nul> Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:45:35 -0400 (GMT-04:00) Fwd Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 11:11:05 -0400 Subject: Re: More UFO Fleets Over Mexico - Smith >From: Rich Reynolds <rrrgroup.nul> >To: ufoupdates.nul >Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 15:36:19 -0500 >Subject: Re: More UFO Fleets Over Mexico >>From: James Smith <zeus001002.nul> >>To: ufoupdates.nul >>Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 11:38:15 -0400 (GMT-04:00) >>Subject: Re: More UFO Fleets Over Mexico >>Thanks, I was looking at a different earlier one, >>I haven't seen this one yet. Will get back to you. >The images in the second and third videos provided at the link >above seem to be items floating in a pool or body of water. I am not too impressed by the latest videos. The first video has some movement of objects relative to each other, but it is not clear if this is due to: 1) the camera moving about its axis, 2) perspective of a lower level object appearing to move past a higher level one although going at the same speed. 3) a Kyle King idea of painted glass layer (s) being moved in front of the camera to create any damn kind of effect they want. Towards the end they have an object apparently go around another object. It seems to wobble a little (turbulence?). If really balloons could they be at different levels? Seems likely, the size is slightly different. The second video has some slight movement between objects. This could be either due to turbulence or perspective (distance from balloons). The third video also has slight movement between objects. Again no telling if this is due to turbulence or perspective or the aliens being drunk. The video quality is poor. The filmer is questionable. >Note the "reflective" values, not the images themselves. Sorry I don't get what you mean. >Kyle King should address this. Sadly, Kyle is unsubscribed. Too much trouble trying to get things posted. Maybe if we all give him enough encouragement, he will post again. [Kyle had problems with various E-Mail software - which wouldn't allow him to format according to the Posting Rules and gave up --ebk] Quoth Mr King: "All Robles Gil's videos are _not_ balloons or birds... some are glass reflections, toy models, cardboard cutouts, and maybe even other stuff he found. Forgive me for being obtuse, but what possible value can there be in the videos you claim to have seen when Robles Gil is a known hoaxer? "And while I'm sure you aren't capable of being fooled, where might others see these other videos that cannot be "explained away as easily"? Besides, finding an obvious hoax isn't explaining away... it's just explaining. Explaining away is what someone does when ignoring obvious hoaxes to support a few less detectable hoaxes." Unless you suggest that Robles Gil is a hoaxer who occasionally gets a real UFO on tape. What an incredibly lucky guy...<g>" Endeth quote Right on Kyle! I have to agree with Kyle that the possiblity of painted glass or balloons is high. My guess is that it cannot be confirmed or denied which is the outcome of most UFO videos and pictures. But they are great for the UFO hucksters, promoters and hypesters!
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp