UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2005 > May > May 11

Re: More UFO Fleets Over Mexico - Velez

From: John Velez <johnvelez.aic.nul>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:39:07 -0400
Fwd Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:49:30 -0400
Subject: Re:  More UFO Fleets Over Mexico - Velez 

>From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 17:18:31 -0500
>Subject: Re: More UFO Fleets Over Mexico

>>From: John Velez <johnvelez.aic.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 16:19:59 -0400
>>Subject: Re: More UFO Fleets Over Mexico

>>>From: Jim Deardorff <deardorj.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 18:20:25 -0700
>>>Subject: Re: More UFO Fleets Over Mexico

>>>>From: James Smith <zeus001002.nul>
>>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>>Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 12:30:13 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
>>>>Subject: Re: More UFO Fleets Over Mexico

>>>>>From: Jim Deardorff <deardorj.nul>
>>>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>>>Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 10:24:41 -0700
>>>>>Subject: Re: More UFO Fleets Over Mexico


>>>>>(b) The hypothesized balloons continue to rise, but do so all at
>>>>>the same rate so that their rising motion is not noticeable in a
>>>>>video that tracks them. This is now your key problem. Their


>>>One of the videos Jaime Maussan has shown, for the 8:30 AM 11
>>>April 2005 event in Mexico City. Video #2, say, in:

>>>Right now you need work just on the hoaxer's problem of getting
>>>all balloons up there and in close, but random positions, and
>>>then having them maintain those positions relative to each other
>>>for about a minute.

>>Jim, Jim, Jim,

>>Oh how you waste your time my friend. James Smith for all his
>>feigned pretension of honest skepticism, is quite the opposite.
>>If Smith is able to accept the sloppy 'proof' that Mr. Franz
>>presented recently while demanding precision and strict
>>adherence to empirical procedure from the Mexican research
>>community, contrary to what his mouth says, what he actually
>>does is to prematurely arrive at conclusions and apply a double
>>standard to everyone else.

Hi Alfred,

You write:

>Thanks for kicking over his rock, John.

Needed doing. I don't know how AJ and Santiago can put up with
his sarcasm and condescension. Those guys have so very
accommodating toward Smith and he just continues to talk down to
them as if they were beneath his contempt. Balls!

I think Smith has an unbelievable crust declaring cases "closed"
and "solved" solely because -he- proclaims them so. Who does
this fellow think he is? Where does he come off?

Even Phil Klass tried to keep more shade on his real motives
than this guy does. Mind you,  Klass was as obvious as they
come. So saying that Smith is less subtle than Klass is really
saying something! <lol>

Alfred, he called me a "believer!"  You know, the debunker's 'F'
word! <Hee-Haw>

Talk to you later bud.....


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com