From: A. J. Gevaerd - Revista UFO <gevaerd.nul> Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 13:48:07 -0300 Fwd Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 13:04:45 -0400 Subject: Re: The Mexican UFO Fleets Footage - Gevaerd >From: John Velez <johnvelez.aic.nul> >To: ufoupdates.nul >Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 18:57:33 -0400 >Subject: The Mexican UFO Fleets Footage >A couple of weeks ago I requested a copy of the Fleet Videos >from Jaime Maussan. As is his habit, he was very friendly and >responsive to my request and he provided me a copy of the videos >on digital videotape. >It is stunning, impressive footage. I will be posting clips from >this video to the Virtually Strange Network website shortly. >People need to see this footage for themselves, so that they can >make up their own minds about it. The people on this List who >have been identifying the objects recorded on video as balloons >need to have their eyes and/or their heads, examined. <snip> >Attempting to destroy the reputation and character of another >human being by calling them a liar and a hoaxer in public is a >very serious thing. Especially when done without having to >present any hard evidence for the allegation. >Amy Hebert and a few others do it way too easily. More, they do >it with a kind of relish and mean-spiritedness that is just >ugly, and revealing of their own black character and personal >agendas. Hebert's recent unjustified public attack on Robles Gil >is a perfect example of what I'm talking about. <snip> >If Mr. Gil is a liar as you say, then I'll assume you had >_incontrovertible_ hard evidence _before_ you called him a liar >in public? If so, share this thoroughly convincing evidence with >the rest of us, please. >It better be first person knowledge too as well as damning and >conclusive proof that he _intentionally_ faked the videos. I'm >curious to learn what it is that you consider ample >justification to attempt to destroy another person's reputation >in public like that. >I hope it's a real good one. >Then, if you will, I want you to tell me who made _you_ the >judge, jury and public executioner of Mr. Gils character. >Ante up, Ms. Hebert. Put up or shut up. Proof positive please. Dear John: I am was absolutely impressed and actually amazed when I saw the videos Jaime showed in Laughlin. So were everybody else at the conference. This is why, since last March, I have been insisting on defending the extraordinary nature of the objects filmed in the flotillas, even when many people - here on this List and others - completely refuse to accept them _without_ even _looking_ at them. Without! I am very glad that, besides me, Santiago, another fellow and you have also seen the videos and can comment them here, to let our colleagues important they are. You described the videos precisely in your e-mail. As for me, they are the most intriguing pieces of evidence that I have ever seen about or visitors. Balloons? Birds? Come on! But I understand the impact the videos can cause for someone is certainly a very hard and very few people impacted that way absorbs the hit. A. J.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp