UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2005 > May > May 20

Re: Michael Salla - Miller

From: Stuart Miller <stuart.miller4.nul>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 19:03:57 +0100 (BST)
Fwd Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:53:35 -0400
Subject: Re: Michael Salla - Miller

>From: Michael Salla <exopolitics.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 04:33:15 -1000
>Subject: Re: Michael Salla

>>From: Mike Jamieson <mike.jamieson.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 12:16:14 -0700
>>Subject: Re: Michael Salla

>>>From: Josh Goldstein <lovolution.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 01:56:55 -0700
>>>Subject: Re: Michael Salla

>>>>From: Mike Jamieson <mike.jamieson.nul>
>>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>>Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 10:48:44 -0700
>>>>Subject: Re: Michael Salla

>>>>>From: Josh Goldstein <lovolution.nul>
>>>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>>>Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 00:29:02 -0700
>>>>>Subject: Re: Michael Salla


>Some individuals will simply look into a whistleblower's
>eyes, listen to the tone of their voice, observe their
>physical posture, and based solely on these physical cues,
>make a judgement call on their integrity and veracity.


>Even if the visual, auditory and other physical cues point to
>someone telling the truth, they will demand more evidence.

Michael et al,

I'm staggered that this point has taken so long to come up in
this debate, particularly when you consider that Dr. Salla's
principle protaganist is a detective. C'mon Josh, you're not
going to tell me that even at an intuitive level, you don't rely
on "a gut feeling" based on signals picked up even sub
concsiously. You won't base a case on it but it might swing
whether someone remains for further questioning or is shown the
door instead.

Far more more affective and reliable than a lie detector test,
while some body actions can be controlled when lying, others,
and in particular the eyes, cannot.

Any decent poker player here on this list will confirm this. We
had enormous fun during the recent British general election,
watching Peter Collett's analysis of what our politicians were
_really_saying as he stripped them down to the bare bones.

There is no question that when applied by an expert, it is a
reliable method of deducing whether someone is telling the truth
and should not be under valued or ignored.

Stuart Miller

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com