UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2005 > May > May 21

Re: Science & Faith Based Approaches - Randle

From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 07:50:18 EDT
Fwd Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 09:53:32 -0400
Subject: Re: Science & Faith Based Approaches - Randle


>From: Christopher Allan <cda.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 18:54:09 +0100
>Subject: Re: Science & Faith Based Approaches

>>From: Michael Salla <exopolitics.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 07:15:22 -1000
>>Subject: Re: Science & Faith Based Approaches

>>>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 10:11:40 EDT
>>>Subject: Re: Science & Faith Based Approaches

>>>>>>Corso claims he told Thurman of the UFOs he discussed in his
>>>>>>book and that Thurman nevertheless agreed to write the foreword
>>>>>>for the Day After Roswell and understood it was about UFOs. It's
>>>>>>likely that during his employment service for the former Senator
>>>>>>he discretely divulged some of the projects he worked on despite
>>>>>>his alleged vow to Lt Gen Trudeau to not go public. Thurman may
>>>>>>have written the foreward as a favor to a former close advisor
>>>>>>but once his staffers discovered what was in Corso's book, they
>>>>>>quickly rescinded permission for the foreword to be used.

<snip>

>>If you read the interview with Michael Lindeman whose URL I
>>provided above, it's quite clear that Corso claims he told
>>Thurman the book was about UFOs. So what happened subsequently
>>was a result of Thurman's staffers withdrawing the preface
>>rather than Thurman himself denying his approval. Do you really
>>expect me to believe that in Corso's proposal he describes
>>Thurman having written a a preface for another book that Corso
>>was intending on using for the Day After Roswell? That is
>>inconsistent with what he says in the Lindeman interview. I
>>think you are clutching at straws in trying to make your case
>>that Corso can't be trusted because of the Thurman preface issue
>>I've looked closely at your arguments and have found nothing
>>compelling in them. Your arguments that Corso is being "less
>>than honest' are red herrings. You appear to be intent on
>>shifting attention away from Corso's claims concerning the ET
>>technology he disseminated into the private sector while working
>>at the Foreign Technology Department at the Pentagon. Since
>>that's a position he clearly held, then surely the possibility
>>that he distributed such technology is the key issue here;
>>rather than questions over Strom Thurman's foreword; Corso's
>>promotion to Col in the reserves; a controversial photo in his
>>book, deferring to Kaufman; etc., all red herrings that get us
>>nowhere.

<snip>

>For goodness sake, please both of you, at least spell the guy's
>name correctly. It is: J. Strom Thurmond (NOT Thurman).


For goodness sake, both the quoted segments were written by
Salla I have spelled Thurmond's name correctly.


KRandle




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com