UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2005 > May > May 23

Re: Google Maps Captures UFO? - Ledger

From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 00:30:29 -0300
Fwd Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 08:45:25 -0400
Subject: Re: Google Maps Captures UFO? - Ledger


>From: Nick Balaskas <Nikolaos.nul>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:33:00 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time)
>Subject: Re: Google Maps Captures UFO?

>>From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 13:11:59 -0300
>>Subject: Re: Google Maps Captures UFO?

>>>From: James Smith <zeus001002.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 08:22:49 -0400 (GMT-04:00)
>>>Subject: Re: Google Maps Captures UFO?

>>>>From: Eleanor White <eleanor.nul>
>>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>>Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:19:13 -0400
>>>>Subject: Re: Google Maps Captures UFO?

><snip>

>>>>Increasingly, it's beginning to look as if anti gravity
>>>>involves strong and perhaps new field types which interact with
>>>>gravity waves (per Tom Bearden for one) and it's quite likely
>>>>that the fuzzing in that photo was due to an advanced field type
>>>>rather than out of focus.

><snip>

>>>The real analysis shows something less than an alien spacecraft.

>>>I agree with the work of the fewllow at the below links.

>>>http://www.flickr.com/photos/44276669.nul/13645955/

><snip>

>>>So the assessment that it is likely registration dots to
>>>match/patch images from different sources makes sense.

><snip>

>>If they are registration marks they are a fuzzy and imprecise
>>representation of same. Usually crosshairs or right angled marks
>>- reticles or graticules, Latin or Fr. - are scribed right into a
>>thin glass between lenses. Note Lunar photos, etc.

>>Why would this particular satellite - or aircraft - camera
>>resort to such an imprecise method? Additionally, some of the
>>white fuzzy dots are only half visible.

>>Not solved for me as yet.

>>How about a high altitude scientific balloon - 300-400 feet in
>>diameter, or smaller - hanging nearly motionless in the same
>>spot for an hour or so, with the aircraft shooting on different
>>east west tracks and getting parallex images of the same object
>>each time?

><snip>

>Hi Everyone!

>If you go back to the web site above and check out the 12 new
>unlike in the science fiction movie "Independence Day".

>If the later is indeed the case, I am sure Don, Eleanor, myself
>and other UFO UpDates Listers with some flying experience would
>willing volunteer to pilot fighter jets against these ETs in
>defense of our planet!  <grin>


ET aside and to just reiterate, Nick, I don't for one moment
believe these are registration marks. For one thing they are too
sloppy and some are only half spheres, but the biggest stake in
the heart of this theory is, why aren't they on other shots on
the Google maps. I've been through a couple of other locations,
most recent was Kansas City, and there are none of the silver-
white spheres on these images.

Thi begs the question, why registration marks on some images and
not on others.

One other point. These spots or whatever are too large and block
out too much information for registration marks. Besides, what's
the matter with the old fashioned cross-hatching? Why sloppy
spots with no definition as to center?


Don





[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com