From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul> Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 08:15:00 -0500 Fwd Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 08:30:36 -0400 Subject: Re: 'Fleet' Is Biased Term - Lehmberg >From: John Velez <johnvelez.aic.nul> >To: ufoupdates.nul >Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 14:10:06 -0400 >Subject: Re: 'Fleet' Is Biased Term >>From: James Smith <zeus001002.nul> >>To: ufoupdates.nul >>Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 09:30:33 -0400 (GMT-04:00) >>Subject: 'Fleet' Is Biased Term >>Who on the List believes that the very term "Fleets" used to >>describe the Mexican UFO videos is biased and leads the reader >>to believe the video is of a collection of intelligently >>controllable vehicles which may at least (though highly >>unlikely) have origination from contemporary Earth and at most >>derive from alien (off-world, time travelers, whatever)? ><snip> >Extra, extra! Read all about it!!! Pot calls kettle black!!!!! ><LMAO> Concern over the use of the word 'flotillas' or 'fleets' or 'armadas', now, seems needlessly strident given Farmington in 1950 and Washington in 1952... despite all the Mexican accounting, and forgetting accounts and artistic representations from the middle ages and even earlier. Pelicans are famous for their red herrings. I just wish they wouldn't pass them through their digestive systems first... >"Biased?" I'll bet your tongue burned even for just thinking the >word. Funny how you're the one who keeps using terms such as >'biased" and 'need for attention.' With regard to skeptibunkers, pelicanists, and other passionate klasskurtxians, I suspect that like their neoconic brethern, they are always guilty of what they would first accuse. Prentending to be the soul of rationality or the remotest arbiter of reason... or ready example of balance... (?) ...is just ludicrous. >No, someone who was declaring an open case closed and who just >happened to have that very solution to the case published in a >'skeptic's' magazine couldn't possibly be "biased" now, could >he? Gotta keep up with the talking points... gotta keep the unknown at bay... gotta keep that plausible deniability alive. >Gimme a break man. Just who is it that you think you're fooling >with this stuff? Ever hear the expression, 'as transparent as a >pane of glass?' More like computer a screen after you've productively sneezed on it, I should think. >Give it a rest debunker. We _all_ know where you stand. No need >to be redundant. We 'get it' (and where you are coming from,) >already. Give him a break... he thought he had a hope of a hope of getting a little bit of gym shorts teased out of the casing for a locker rupture he'd use to raise a little duplicitous avian dust, you know? Besides, lack of courage, intellectual or otherwise, is a cross to bear. I almost feel sorry for him. Then I remember that to me, for my money, drawn through my filters (which are designed a little differently than usual you may agree) avians are only what stands between us and a fully funded 'Manhattan or Genome' project... Verily, the point is not lost on Mexico, South America, South Korea, Japan, and China. Hell's bells, We'll still be lighting our farts when they are on a hydrogen economy living in the 22nd century... It's all a little bigger than we're allowed to know. alienview.nul -:|:- www.AlienView.net Still... stand with me in desert's dark sans city-light or shine. The air is cold and dry and stark... a moment froze in time... The starfield is... immense... out there, a billion shards of light... bedazzling us with brilliance born from blue and red burned bright. There is no cloud or moon to hide this... grandeur... halting breath... It is the bald antithesis of darkness... and even ageless death... ...A million, million points ...off white... all glitter in your view. They symbolize near endless time... producing me and you! They are the... pressure cookers... of the matter that we mind, an ageless mass of living things considers what it finds. Down 'here' produced are 'people'... some are humans that we know, but crows and whales and wolves and bees, much loved by us? Well, frankly, no. Now pick one star, just any star. Pick one from all the millions! The 'space' that star will mask from view...(?) a trifling, spatial minion. Now take that minion's picture, then blow it up all huge... This photograph can stop your heart! It amplifies you views. It's not mere stars you're seeing as the picture fills your eyes! It's billions of new galaxies... as STARS within that striking sky! Now tell me we're 'alone' in this, or the state of God's proud art! We bejewel creation's crown, or light a sad Earth's fart? It's clear we're pre-pubescent (...if passed the womb at all!). It's clear our 'immaturity' could insure our failing fall. It's clear in layered evidence we're pompous, insincere... but UFOs remain extant to be our new frontier! They are the best 'sedition' if you think on it at all. That's why the 'man' ignores them, plying hurdle, screen, and stall! They're why we have an 'info' void well larded with the smirks of skeptibunky charlatans and other funded jerks. They're why we're in denial... they're why we are 'regressed'... they prove our 'fubar' culture... they'd illustrate we've failed tests.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp