UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2005 > May > May 27

Re: British National Archives UFO Research Guide -

From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 16:08:24 -0300
Fwd Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 07:07:35 -0400
Subject: Re: British National Archives UFO Research Guide -

>From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 18:05:09 +0100
>Subject: Re: British National Archives UFO Research Guide

>>From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
>>To:  ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 13:31:23 -0300
>>Subject: Re: British National Archives UFO Research Guide


>>If you ask me [which you didn't], this thread too, is a waste of
>>bandwidth. Why don't the affected listers take it offline and
>>battle it out there? It's the documentation itself that is
>>important, not who got it first. We'll be down to hours and
>>minutes before too long.

>>Don Ledger

>Unfortunately. the "affected listers" includes everyone who
produces original research, and as such it is vital to ufology
as a whole. How would you feel, Don, if having spent two years
of research someone came along and claimed that you had nothing
to do with the results?

>The consequence of this, as I have pointed out, is a reluctance
to share early research results. This in turn means less
collaboration, and less progress. If we sit idly by and let
disputed claims go unchallenged in the open, ufology will become
even more retarded that it already is.


>Joe (Retard-in-chief)

Where confusion applied to specific cases from the documents I
could understand the need for accuracy, but the legitimacy of
the documents from TNA would not be in question, regardless of
who got them in the first place.

But don't you think that Roberts or Clarke can argue this in
their own stead rather than you and Martin with Nick Pope. They
are the ones affected.

As for collaboration, I think it will be a frosty day in hell
before you and Nick line up on the same side.

Re retarded, are you referring to us as being mentally
challenged or retarded as in the sense of being held back?

My last on this. It's Errol's call.


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com