UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2005 > May > May 27

Re: Bob Lazar Element 115 Massive Stars & Heavy

From: John Scheldroup <jschel.nul>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 20:26:48 -0500
Fwd Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 10:46:27 -0400
Subject: Re: Bob Lazar Element 115 Massive Stars & Heavy


>From: Rich Reynolds <rrrgroup.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 09:42:32 -0500
>Subject: Re: Bob Lazar Element 115 Massive Stars & Heavy Metal

>>From: John Scheldroup <jschel.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 09:19:01 -0500
>>Subject: Re: Bob Lazar Element 115 Massive Stars & Heavy Metal

>>>From: Rich Reynolds <rrrgroup.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 11:23:30 -0500
>>>Subject: Re: Bob Lazar Element 115 Massive Stars & Heavy Metal

>>>I did the cuttings and now I have something that looks like a
>>>swan and two bandages on my fingers.

>>>Could you show a picture of the thing you ended up with?

>>Looks about right. Similar, anyway, if not exactly the same:

>>http://periodictable.com/pages/AAE_SeaborgPhoto.html

>>You've _not_ cut all the way to the inert elements and it should
>>be, to show the full effects.

><snip>

>>H & He should be back to back, as they are only S orbital, with
>>He above the fixed Ne (the noble elements remain the attachment
>>point up & down as all orbitals are filled).

>>It now all lines up by electron orbitals (across (s,p,d,f)) and
>>by "free" positions to donate or accept electrons, depending if
>>you are going left to right or right to left as you "slide" the
>>bits back in below what's above them. And chemical properties
>>pretty much depend on that and the mass.

>Thanks John:

>Especially for the photo., which looks like a hat I once owned.

>And when I get done with this quantum origami, how can I use it,
>productively I mean?

This page is pretty has a pretty good representation:

http://home.att.net/~lfretzin/notes06.html

A coincidence that bizmuth and element 115 line up, Lazar was he
reading that day?

IMHO, gravity control more research needs to be done.

http://www.sei.co.jp/sn/2001/08/feature_article.html

"superconductors that become superconductive in liquid helium.
In 1986... "

http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/physics/0108005

Physics, abstract

Impulse Gravity Generator Based on Charged YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-y}
Superconductor with Composite Crystal Structure

http://www.superconductors.org/gravity.htm

Impulse Gravity Generator ?

Based on Charged YBa2Cu3O7-y Superconductor
with Composite Crystal Structure

Courtesy:
Los Alamos National Laboratory

By Eugene Podkletnov and Giovanni Modanese
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 16:13:38 GMT
Date (revised v2): Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:25:42 GMT

http://www.spacedaily.com/news/rocketscience-02t.html

According to the JDW report, Boeing recently approached
Podkletnov directly, but fell foul of Russian technology
transfer controls. The GRASP briefing document cited by Jane's
noted that BAE Systems and Lockheed Martin have also contacted
Podkletnov "and have some activity in this area".

In conclusion the briefing document said additional "classified
activities in gravity modification may exist". But moreover,
Podkletnov was strongly anti-military and was only wanting to
provide assistance if the research was conducted out in the
"white world" of open development.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2157975.stm

Research explored

But documents obtained by Jane's Defence Weekly and seen by the
BBC show that Boeing is taking Dr Podkletnov's research
seriously.

The hypothesis is being tested in a programme codenamed Project
Grasp.

Boeing is the latest in a series of high-profile institutions
trying to replicate Dr Podkletnov's experiment.

http://www.zae-bayern.de/ectp/abstracts/reiss1.html

A possible interaction between gravity and high temperature
superconductivity - by a materials property?

An analogous screening of the gravity field, within present
understanding of superconductivity, is not to be expected. But
we have seen a slight increase of the mass of a high temperature
superconductor when it was cooled to LN2 temperatures.

http://arxiv.org/html/cond-mat/9812070

A possibility of emission of high frequency gravitational
radiation from junctions between d-wave and s-wave
superconductors.

http://fy.chalmers.se/~tomten/--Xjobb/Sidan4.html

Thus if a Cooper pair tunnels in an uncharged Josephson junction
it will momentarily charge the junction with the charge
plus/minus 2e, increasing the energy by 4EC. In a single
junction this is usually not a problem because with some help
from Heisenberg's uncertainty law, Et>/2, the charge slips
quickly away from the junction, discharging it before the energy
conservation law notices. But if there is any obstacle close
after the junction, for example another junction or a resistor,
the junction might stay charged long enough for the energy law
to catch up.




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com