From: James Smith <zeus001002.nul> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 16:55:17 -0400 (GMT-04:00) Fwd Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 15:40:31 -0400 Subject: Field Research & Images [was: Armstrong & Aldrin's >From: Diana Cammack <cammack.nul> >To: <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:29:38 +0200 >Subject: Re: Armstrong & Aldrin's UFO >>From: James Smith <zeus001002.nul> >>To: ufoupdates.nul >>Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 09:52:01 -0400 (GMT-04:00) >>Subject: Re: Armstrong & Aldrin's UFO >>As I always say, we need some field research. >>Look at TAPS and their ghost research. Can anyone say that the >>state of the art in UFO field research cannot exceed the quality >>of TAPS ghost investigations? If not, maybe we should all go >>into ghost hunting instead. Plus the SciFi channel seems to have >>gotten them alot of nice equipment and nice digs. >Field research, of what sort? I presume you don't mean something >as simple as a Sky-watch? or something as different as what the >Cseti group used to do with bright lights and meditation? Or how >about what they did in Florida where they went to a regular >sighting spot on the beach and took photos? How would your >'field research' differ? and to achieve what results different >than those achieved by these other folk? Ha! No, I mean stereo imagery and spectra as a minimum from one site. Prefer two sites. Prefer continuous night operation. Prefer automated data collection. Would like to build up instrument collection to get precursor signals (VLF EMF?, VLF sound?) Also, prefer mobile sites (get baseline observations and then be able to go to flap areas). Prefer to use sychronized telescopic computer tracking systems which amateur satellite observers use to video satellites. Photos alone aren't going to do it. Stereo imagery is a start to get distance and spectra (with a good spectra database) can be used to quickly rule out prosaic things. The goal is to be able to follow (I.E. use the ranging data to follow it to orbital altitude.) the damn thing either from space to ground or visa versa thus proving that at least ONE UFO is from space. I think the problem with most folk who do UFO field research is that they just want to prove they actually SAW something. We know there are UFOs out there, but the problem is not trying to prove to anyone that you really saw something. It is to show they are alien (or super-secret human technology I suppose). You can't do this with a nice photo shoot. You need some high speed telescopic stereo video. Of course, if it just appears/disappears, you get nowhere. Pretty pictures get you nowhere. Even _one_ stereo photo is worth alot.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp