UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Apr > Apr 18

Re: The Roswell Incident - The True Story - Kaeser

From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:27:15 -0400
Fwd Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:11:08 -0400
Subject: Re: The Roswell Incident - The True Story - Kaeser

>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:06:03 +0200
>Subject: Re: The Roswell Incident - The True Story

>>From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:43:50 -0400
>>Subject: Re: The Roswell Incident - The True Story


>>A Roswell documentary produced by Roswell researchers would
>>likely have little interest outside the genre, which is one of
>>the problems with self-production and promotion. I also believe
>>that the Roswell case has become so tainted by time and
>>confabulation over the years that there there is no way of
>>getting the general public spun up with excitement about it.
>>Unless there is new information to impart, I don't believe that
>>repeating old data and information is going to lead very far.

>There is no need for new in formation, or big science, to
>evaluate the Mogul story.

>Just go to an art and craft store, buy a balsa wood stick, 8 mm
>thick, brake it with your fingers, and you will see in two
>seconds what it's worth: nobody, not even Laurel and Hardy,
>could take that for flying saucer debris.

>On the other hand, yes, it takes a 1,000 pages book to blurr
>such a simple test. Or an expensive TV show, maybe.

Hi Gildas,

If course your comparison would be flawed and have little to do
with the actual Mogul project, but it would make a point I
suppose. You assume the veracity of the witnesses, which is in
question for most of the skeptical. Strange charactoristics
given to the debris is annecdotal and for the skeptical remains
a "myth".  I would guess that if cornered, a skeptic would say
they are either lying or their memories are confabulated. Can
you prove otherwise, beyond the expression of opinion?
Personally I believe the Mogul explanation is a stretch, and
unlikely to be the cause of the Roswell debris field, but I
can't prove that well enough to kill the theory.

I have found that science generally has no curiousity in this
area and unless it becomes a profit generator I don't see any
reason for scientists to care. A thread on another list has
generated a discussion regarding how to involve scientists in
this quest, and how we can bring credibility to the field, but
the key is always funding. Since it doesn't exist at this time,
 little hope in moving any of the ideas forward.


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com